Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/412/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/412/2004 Généré par l'IA

Petitioner v. Governmental Entity (Land Use Injunction Denial)

Numéro de cause ATAS/412/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A petitioner appealed a ruling that denied their request for injunctive relief, which was sought to prevent a governmental entity from proceeding with a land-use action that allegedly violated the established environmental impact statement procedures and the requisite zoning requirements. The court reasoned that the administrative record contained sufficient evidence to support the entity's compliance with the environmental review process, and furthermore, the petitioner failed to demonstrate the requisite irreparable harm necessary to warrant the extraordinary remedy of an injunction, especially since the legislative branch had already taken definitive action concerning the land's status, thus upholding the lower court's denial.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Petitioner v. Governmental Entity (Land Use Injunction Denial): The court reasoned that the administrative record contained sufficient evidence to support the entity's compliance with the environmental review process, and furthermore, the petitioner failed to demonstrate the requisite irreparable harm necessary to warrant the extraordinary remedy of an injunction, especially since the legislative branch had already taken definitive action concerning the land's status, thus upholding the lower court's denial.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
action en interdiction conformité à la zone exception d'inconstitutionnalité qualité pour recourir contre permis conformité aux normes environnementales droit foncier

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the judicial costs of the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               !"#$!%##$ !$&%!%##$



'( )(* * ' ( *

+,  - .  &/  %##$ 



0 1111111111 





22 * ' *3 * !" "!#$ !!&' %#



                 

   ",(,"  

-. -/0'#!,+100! 1&2!3 4  '!!2 5!6!122!! 7.89999999999:1 1 '!!  8#! &! 7 -;#&<,/2 !=2!-;#&<,/.

,. >&,+7.89999999999:1  '!!2%  !<    ! 3 84   :  !.

/. -*&!,+ 8 ! &2!2 51 !' '!!22!! -/0'#!,+2' 1! &!'!#&.

  2 * )(* * ' ( * 4050   6  700 0  3 &+% *

 3440   7

-.   : 100!   1&2! 51! ?  !  7. 89999999999: 2! 1!2!'2@%2!  #!51! # '!!.

,. 1A &5 <!.  @00!%B  '! B   A8 '!7    2!0& 2'C!0!'=2!!!51:100!0' ' !2@00

  ()*+(,+