Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/405/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/405/2007 Généré par l'IA

Governmental Immunity for Discretionary Regulatory Functions

Numéro de cause ATAS/405/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved whether a governmental entity could be held liable for alleged negligence leading to injury, based on the manner in which it regulated and enforced compliance with safety standards concerning construction or operation practices. The court reasoned that the entity's actions, characterized as discretionary regulatory and inspection functions, fell under a discretionary function immunity, which shields such governmental activities from liability unless a specific statute explicitly waives immunity for such conduct, thus affirming the dismissal of the action against the entity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Governmental Immunity for Discretionary Regulatory Functions: The court reasoned that the entity's actions, characterized as discretionary regulatory and inspection functions, fell under a discretionary function immunity, which shields such governmental activities from liability unless a specific statute explicitly waives immunity for such conduct, thus affirming the dismissal of the action against the entity.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
action en responsabilité immunité de juridiction de l'État protection de l'intérêt public motifs de sécurité responsabilité des organes de la tutelle exclusion de responsabilité communale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/915/2007
Statutory Immunity for Regulatory Enforcement Actions
A/2170/2007
Sovereign Immunity and Liability for Proprietary Function
A/1739/2005
Governmental Immunity in Infrastructure Maintenance Liability
A/2484/2005
Discretionary Immunity vs. Ministerial Duty in Property Maintenance Negligence
A/4472/2006
Sovereign Immunity in Public Function Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

             

!!"

 ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

%&'   ( ) *  



 !!!"#$#% &    ' '(



 ('

))   *     %+' !(!" , - (.$/#$##01#2

      

   4$524  

' '-' "'(-!0 !'6

'"- *))   *     7!4-'0  8+9"1'!'$::+6

 '!;"<' $$9"1'!'$::+* '-- '( -( '(7!4-'0' '(8 (( '='"*!-!("('1!-(!(6

'"- (('!0'>! ( ((<?!-!("('1!*  !/:@?6

 ''!'+'$::+'"-' '!;''1! "!'"=!  1,7!4-'0"86

  '"-    "  $: ' $::+ >! "' ?!1' *--'"!(!   "!('!((>! '*!-!("('1!' '(* ! /:@?(?'1 !' -' -  '!;!((! "1!' ?6

 ''!' '!;"$%'$::+-' - (A-'(! ' 9!='(!4 6

"! (' ,"A-'(!- '"('!'%1'!$::+(*!!(! >  1'-'(''B(* ''!('6

(( >  -'(!    ( - -- " <  -' - !(!   '!;   "!9!A"C ++++++

! %" , - $" ! #$ %##$ " !#%" % $"

( .//0   1

2%030'' 4 .  5 $67

#C  (<* >"!! D";'$::E( !9!"  >  ' !( <  !4'( *!1!!(" -!  #' F1!' $::/ ( 9!A"

- ''"!"('!"C



3-' "'  42524   $C 1!( *  < (('  -  -' "'  '"1!!     '(  *"$::DC

2C *, ((>; !C

.C  <-'-(! *" (C

/C --!(! G'(C/: !9 '-'(!>G-1(9 '' ' ' ('-'"(''B("!2:F '0 (!9!(! -'-! ' "'" '!;9""''HI!J'H 9>!EE::.   (' !A-!'C"!-(B('-'  ="C" !' !(K 8!!>'A((>"!! ' '("!' ;(!'!(- "!! ((>"6;8A- '- '> (!9!(!- 1 !''(( ('"!! 68- '('!=('  '-'"((C!" !'  (!( -  (' ! ""( ""'"   ((' 8 ;8 ( 8 !4  '!;9""''- ''-(''(!0''' '>G! 1'"''!''1;C" !'' '(! ' ' ,  -'1 >! ' ( F !( !! >  "!!  ((>" ( G1 --  >"("A-"!"' '(7'(C#2$#:E(#:D8C     ='99!'K '"!(K   !'' ;

  -!  9 '  -'"( ''B( (  (!9!" A -'(! ( < *99! 9""'  ' !-'='99



3-' "'