Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/405/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/405/2006 Généré par l'IA

Sale vs. Loan Characterization of Repurchase Agreements

Numéro de cause ATAS/405/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over whether certain transactions constituted a sale or a loan, focusing on whether there was an immediate right to repurchase the property at a fixed price. The court determined that the primary indicator was the intent of the parties and the absence of an unconditional obligation to repay, concluding that the transactions were genuine sales where the seller retained an option to repurchase, rather than disguised loans, because the relevant agreements fixed the repurchase price irrespective of the initial consideration paid, thus distinguishing them from security interests intended to function as mortgages.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Sale vs. Loan Characterization of Repurchase Agreements: The court determined that the primary indicator was the intent of the parties and the absence of an unconditional obligation to repay, concluding that the transactions were genuine sales where the seller retained an option to repurchase, rather than disguised loans, because the relevant agreements fixed the repurchase price irrespective of the initial consideration paid, thus distinguishing them from security interests intended to function as mortgages.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
opération de pension contrat de prêt opérations portant sur des titres vente d'immeuble vente à crédit prix ferme

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive to rule on the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

   

#$%&#'((& #%()#'((&

 * 

+ "+ *  +* *

*, - .

! '  '((&

  

 !!!!!!!!!!" #$%    " &%'% & '

((( ( ( ' $&' ) %' # #$  * '# # +' # 

'

((      (  ,  "   '$% # '-' ./"  &' 0012" 3033    0

         ! "  !

7 042 7

!  / 0!  !!!!!!!!!!  #%&%  0/ #%$- 0//8  #$# #*#$'%   #*)-'% &9 #  ((      (  ,  :7&9  ;<

 & #% # 00 #%$- 0//8" 7 * =$% >* ?''  #$#  $'= >   @' # $$  %'' #' ) @' ') A #B #  C!!!!!!!!!!

  0D ?) 0//6" *'%%" &%'% & ((( ( ( "  =$% &&' A #' #%<

 & #%  &&' # 6 =%) 0//6"    =$%  #%<

 *'%%  '?'%   D $ 0//6<

    =$%  - # %"  . ) 0//6" >* # )' %'%  '  '' #  C!!!!!!!!!!' *'%%" &'' '$$'   9@$' #  % # < > #9 "  #  &)' #%$ & = )  #'  )$' #*#$'% #*)-'%<

 &  # 03 ) 0//6" *'%%  #%% '  <

*   0!   @)  E@' ?# :;  %'% $#=% '  ''%" #9  3 F' 0//2"  - ' #  " $&% # 8 ?@" #'  &%#' '  )7&%#'" 8 &&%' ' 36 ?@  :'G 3 'G  ' 86 ; <

 ' A E' # E%' # 36 ?@ " &  - =%#%  0D ?) 0//. : H 32/  3/6;"  #  @)  #&'%"  32 =%)"  #&' '' @' &$'''  - ' #   # %@   A ' ?@ ''" " # E''' # E%' # )B ?@  <

=$%$' A *'G 86  G 3 'G  IG 5 "  - ' #   +'  ' > # ''' &%) A E'G 86 #   =%#%   &' @%% # #' #   # 6 '- 0/// '%  )@  3 ?) 0//2 : ;" > ' ') A   =%#%  E7IJ$@ -@' ' E#$'%   #E)-'% # 08 ? 3150 : ;<

  $&%' & ?@ #  #E&9 '  %'- <

45.640//6

7 242 7

    %'% '% <

E )' #E &# ' ' # K   # J <

 * 1  "+ *  +* *

!

23/   4  5   67 .&'  8

  / 

3G %   )-G

! /

3G # ' # '' # G

0G K   # JG

2G ' >  &%# ' @''G

 @==9  %#' M

7  L    

 & =$ # &%' N' ' '=% B &'

45.640//6