ATAS/379/2006 · Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

ATAS/379/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/379/2006 Généré par l'IA

Cost Award Following Successful Appeal Based on Insufficient Findings

Numéro de cause ATAS/379/2006

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de Justice (Cour civile) · Chambre des assurances sociales

Juridiction

Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)

Date de la décision 2006-04-27

Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over liability for costs following the successful appeal of a prior determination, where the appellate court found the original decision flawed due to a lack of essential findings and the subsequent application of incorrect legal standards. The appellate court reasoned that since the appellant obtained substantially the relief sought, they were the prevailing party entitled to costs, even though the initial reversal did not completely grant every request, emphasizing that the appellate success was the primary factor in determining the cost award under the relevant procedural rules.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Cost Award Following Successful Appeal Based on Insufficient Findings: The appellate court reasoned that since the appellant obtained substantially the relief sought, they were the prevailing party entitled to costs, even though the initial reversal did not completely grant every request, emphasizing that the appellate success was the primary factor in determining the cost award under the relevant procedural rules.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA

mise à la charge des frais avance de frais remise des frais de procédure réexamen d'une décision antérieure qualité pour recourir décision motivée

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final orders concerning the allocation of court costs.

Généré par l'IA

C/6608/2017

Appeal on Award of Costs After Partial Success on Monetary Claim

A/2291/2013

Appeal on Cost Allocation Following Partially Successful Claim and Expert Assessment

A/3637/2011

Rectification of Appellate Decision for Failure to Award Costs

C/16616/2022

Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Grounds Regarding Cost Award Denial

A/1268/2009

Partial Success on Appeal: Award of Reduced Legal Costs

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final orders concerning the allocation of court costs.

Texte complet

$%&''$(&&) $*+'$(&&,

- !.- / -! /.

0 1 * (+ 2 (&&,

$ % & 23" ' (!" #!)*+(, #-.( */0- &1&1 -

$ && (, #--0*(*- -

! "#

*6 " 78# -5 ,#9" -++0( "!9 ,"!:" !# 2,9!; # # :< = > ," 2 !< " (2?*-<"!*50/(# !" ( 2@7!*5@@(;!A2#!#"!2--,#9"*55.6

-6 )!33"!, !#!378#,"2!#2( "!9,"!:"!# " 2,"#8," !#!2< !","2< B," 3! 2 ,"2, C,#"!86

D6 78# !< "( < 23!!#!3 *" <9" -++0( 2#2 #"! E 33! "!9 # " ! , " C2#! ,"#8 < !","2< B6

.6 "!92!#",2!#!##! ,"2< B "2 ,"!#! !;" ##< !";!,"" "#"!8( !##"--,#9"*55.#*" <9"-++06

06 &A8!#"(!2#22#9!F

1 ;E!#"<!, " $ ' ' 33!!2 G $ % ' #; ##,"##! 2,": ##"!:"E2<!#G$"6H*E06*0*" <9"-++0I

@6 #G"(!E#<2"2F

1 ;E,": "!8( #"<!2 , " E'J,!# !<"!#!" :<='>(*"32<"!"D*7!#*550#*" # 9"*550 D*"*55@#; #!#! ,"2< B," 3! #" <# " ,# !9" ,8 <"# ,": $ && ( " ; #" <!#( "

* <9"-++0($"6.ED+D6/+I

1 ;E #"<!2 , " 7;E D* 29"-++.#;E2#!#33!!2G & $ % $ && #; ,#E2<!#(*" <9"-++0(G DHE/-D6@+I

/6 !332"# #"!! "A!#"#! #2#2#"!C ,"#!6

4.+554-++0 D

H6 E9E 97#! 2!!,"#!(2#28"2G78"6

!/.

*6 E"#6 -0 ! 322" " !9" ,8 ,"2< B ," 3! (<!!("<!<##!<!!#2*/29"*55D=$>( #"2<!8"*"7<!"-+++(":8," 2"!< "6 "; 7 !# #,A "","##! "#!G,"#8"="#6*--# *-D !<! 1 >( 78 ! !< " ,2## E"#6 /D 6* !322"","2< B," 3! -07!*5H-=>( !#G:< "!9# " !,!*" K#-++D( !#( ,": ; E33!" ! 2#2 #"! ="#6 *.- >( C2#" E 33! ,"#8"92"2,"#!#! 2#"!2,"78!< ".

-6 & E"#6-- $= <#"<!8",!*"7<!"-+++>( !< "(,"##! "#!;!"#"!8 #,"#82 3 "2#C"#6*--(*-D(*.*#*.- I"#6DG0$E,,!;# ," 8! ##G#"32""=6*>6 "); 7 !#(,"##! "#!G,"#8" "", G!332"#","##! "#!(8#2 < !" !9" ,8 C!## 2<## # !< "( # ,"##! "#!( 8#2 < !" !9" ,8 C!## 2<## # ! "!8=36"#6-.$>6 " ( 7 #G,"##! "#!#GE< !"!9",8C!## # ! "!8 !#2"L# # !< " = $*-H-D+I $*-5...>6

D6 A,:(78,"!:"!# " 2,"#8," !#!2 < !","2< B"6#,"#!# #(A,"#( "!8( -- ,#9" *55.( A#" ,"# *" <9" -++0( # G ;78#!< "#<C2# !"6

& # ," !#( ,"##! ;! ,# "!8 ," " # H*E03"6*06 !# G C12, .+E00/3"6@+ =H*E03"6*0F->6

< !" 2,"##"!:"E2:<#G.DE+-/3"6D+=DHE/-D3"6@+M .ED+D3"6/+>( ! 9! ;E !# G C1 7 !# ## -*E0*D3"6@0 =.DE+-/3"6D+F->6

4.+554-++0 .

23!!#!<(E# ";! !#G" ## *5E+.D3"650=.+E00/3"6@+1-*E0*D3"6@0>6

.6 3 "2# G 7"!,"( ,! 7 " 2#"!# , " ,"#8 7;E # #"3"# ,"##! "#! "( 7 !# !< "2 9223!!!" ## ,"##! " !# G !#2"L# ,# !" " ## 1!6 !#2"L# # 2 #C !! 28 E"#6 *- E " " ,"2< B ," 3! <!!( "<!<# # !<!!#2 *H <"! *5H. = -> #C "28#!"( ! !1! # ,2"!" = $ ,9!2 D@4+- *H 7!# -++D>

06 2 #","N(," 2"2##8"#!#="#6/D6-# H5'6* !"," 2"!!#"#!<*-,#9"*5H0>6

OOO

4.+554-++0 0

! /.3 !.- / -! /.

456 7 8 9# :,( /;

*6 <!# $ % ' G #"32""( ,# !" ( *5E+.D3"650G$ && 3<" ( !! ; !#2"L# ,# !" !2"#(:*" <9"-++07;E ##"3"#6

-6 AB ##;9 !6

D6 !#;," 2"#8"#!#6

.6 3 " ,"#! ;E ,<# 3 "" " " #" ,"2# ""L# 2! D+ 7 " : #!3!#! ," ,! " 2 "2 "!9 322" "( &)P!Q") 3;! @( @++. ( #" ! C,!"6 2! ,# L#" ," 826 2 !" !# F > !!;" C## ; 2!! " "# 2!" 9#!" ! # , 2!! ##;2I9>C, ", "; #!3!#!, < !""## #"2!! I>, "#"!8#" ","2##6&!2 !" #!# , #" ! 22# 22"2 ##" > 9> # > !1( "!9322"", "",#""#!:""" ";E! <"2""!""<962 !"" "#! " " B ,"<( ;! " # 7 !#( !! ; 2!! ##;2 # E< ,, ;2#2C,2!2" "#="#6*D-(*+@#*+H>6

8"33!:" "2!#F !$$ ?"!& ?

,! 3 ","2#""L## #!3!2C,"#!!!;AGA33!322" " !,"8"33

4.+554-++0

Cost Award Following Successful Appeal Based on Insufficient Findings

Synthèse Legislator

Regeste Legislator

Mots-clés

Dispositions légales citées

Décisions connexes

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Texte complet