Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/372/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/372/2007 Généré par l'IA

Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/372/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant challenged a judgment upholding a tax assessment, arguing that the taxing authority miscalculated the value of intangible assets, specifically goodwill, when valuing the business for property tax purposes, contending that the required use of a specific valuation method yielded an arbitrary and excessive result. The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Tax Assessment of Intangible Assets (Goodwill) Valuation Dispute: The court reasoned that the taxing authority's method, which relied on capitalization of earnings to derive the intangible value, was a permissible, standard approach under the relevant statutes, and that the appellant failed to demonstrate that the resulting assessment was so excessive as to be illegal or that the methodology was applied arbitrarily or based on clear error, thus affirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assessment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
estimation de la fortune commerciale taxations fiscales bien immatériel goodwill valeur litigieuse impôt foncier

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
A/1524/2001
Tax Valuation Dispute Over Asset Value
A/4319/2006
Tax Assessment Valuation Dispute and Procedural Remedies
A/3076/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Affirmed Against Petitioner
A/414/2004
Taxpayer Challenge to Business Asset Valuation Methodology Upheld
A/3712/2006
Tax Assessment Upheld on Related-Party Asset Sale Below Market Value

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs are imposed on the appellants as they lost the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

           &'()&*++, &-.*&*++.



#  /#   #  

01  2 % - 3  *++.        !" # !    ! !" $ %& !'()"(  !*"(  +(         (   &&, &  "7  * &     &-  & *  &      .  / 0) &(%123   4  $  - ()  !56 &  

              ! "# $% % 

  58:  

 4 

<= >1!( 5;>)566;9?!@!0  0 '!?( .%'? /'" )  !" <9:6("<9A9!" ( 59><9B2=

5= &@77A  '(7 >1!('"("  "(C'( D*"(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E '7D'@ "'C (!1=

2=  '"  ) ( ) "7(7  9 ! 566; (  >1!(  0 '!?("("(!<;!566; 0 " 'D%'?  !((F(7"=

A=  0 "(" '(! ((( '")E '('"((( "7 '( !!D !(( )D (!1((59><9B2( 9!566;=

A= *((!"' 0 "'! *"(07()(G

&    55 ! 566;   &&  ,   &   * &        & -  &  *  &          .  / ((( F D ! (77" '<>)<99A!(( ) !"'( <22*B237=A:("H(9!566;!'=

"( *C(( !'( )  (( &% (!' ( !'(D ! ()""'(!(  *(( '0D ' <9B2=  * ' ( ' "(" ! F (())77(""=

& !   0  "     '   <: )!0 566; '"")()"( *77(("( <>)<9B: 2< I( <9B: ( ) !0"  <B (0 <9B: F  !   '(( ( 9;27=9:!'( @?D'(=

 !  D( F   "(" 77" '?  ' 7 ( (  $ & $  J% . ) ==  .&&&/& D(7"")F-    &&  *&& D%!H!(7""C%'?  && & &     & & &&  #&=56>( 566;&4&&- "")K'(( 0'1   ' '"(" ( * "1!( (7"" '?  4  $

    89:38566; 28:  

   < >) 566; "(( '"" D *(' , &  .&&&/  )( 7"  '  @1   1(   '")E '7=

& <9>566;4  $  7!"D )  ! "(( 3A5*B;97=;:(( L<83<;658 ( <6*55:7<:' 0'1 L523A:6("H(9!566; !'=

B=  !(("("(!C'(> ( D"D*F "7( *0)( *5)566BH(( ((0=

:= *0 *0>(  "7C""("1 "F>1=



  

<= *(=5: 7" "0'1 '")E'7 )))(() (" <B "!0<992.-/(")1 <>)5666?1'"   )=D>(( ' M '(( (F'(1.(=<55(<52   )% / >1   )!'"(( *(=B2=< 7" " '")E '7  5: > <935 ./ ( F ?)  0 (  '<I(5662 ('?D*77  "("(!.(=<A5 /C"( *77'(10  "  "'(( "(!"'>1  )=

5= &*(=55-.)()1 '<>)5666/  )  '((  ( D (  !1 ( '(1" 7!"!( C(=<55<52<A<(<A5 N(=2F: -*''D( '1!((F(7".=</=@D>('((  (F'(1' F 77"('(( (1!("  )  0 '1 C(( ")(!(  !!(  ) (  '(( (1!(" ) 0'1C((")(!( !!(  !1.7=(=5A-/=>( F  '((  ( ( F *)  0 '1 C((  !!(     !1  ("H(   !!(  ) . - <53  526N -<59AAA/=

2=  M'?  >1  '!? (  " ( C '(   D* "(( * )'(1'!(" ) '")E'7 D ' @  "'C (  !1=  ( '(( ( M

    89:38566; A8:  

'( !159><9B2 M('(9!566; (FD >1!(  )( )C"(=

A= &  !( ' (  '(( D '  !  (  3:5*99A7=36.3A5*B;97=;:O<6*55:7=<:/= D' !  (  <22*B23 7= A:=  ("H( ( ">F "(" " '  (((  '")E "7 =  !  (FC%"'!((  A5;*A9B 7= A6 .3:5*99A 7=36 G5/ (  !   ( ;;*3;9 7= 56 .<22*B237=A: G 5/  ( D *(  !  D ( F  C%"'  !(( 2:9*;537=56=

:= 7!"!( F  >'  '  > "(!( '  '(1 >D*!!( (7( '(( (  !>( )"0""7 (('(( (F ("H(!'( !(( %= ("H(("(C!!!"1*(=<5 * '")E'7)))(() ("  <3 ) <93A . 5/    (C "1!(  % ( '" . -'0"2;865 <3>(5662/=

;=  "!!(   'K  '"  "(( 1(( .(= B2 = 5  ( 39$=< '"  !(() <5'(!0<93:/=

    89:38566; :8:  

  5 4   /#   #  

%

67 8 00 9  :        ; < 2,* $=

<= )(  4  $   F (7"  !'(   !! 2:9*;537=56F &&,  & * &     &-  &  *  &          .  /  7)   !   D  ("H( !'(     "( ?9!566;>D*!!( (7(=

5= ME !((D 0=

2= 7!  '(   DM ')( 7!  (  '"( H(   "  26 > ?  (7( '?  0 7" " .&@PQ@7D;;66A  /') !(?  ( '07!"!(C(=35 7" " 07" " <B > 566: . -/N  !"!   (  D   !(7 ( !E ')('(1( ( ! (N ( H(  "  0 7" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(D C  (  *(= A5  -=  '"( H( (  '?  '  ()D"!!!E ') )(H(>(F*)=  177?  " (G     % R 4  

'7! '"(H(((7"C'(DMFM777" " '177

    89:38566;