Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/365/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/365/2005 Généré par l'IA

Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use

Numéro de cause ATAS/365/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a lower court's grant of summary judgment in a dispute concerning the scope of an easement, where the easement holder sought to expand its use beyond the original prescriptive period grant to accommodate significantly larger and more frequent loads than originally contemplated. The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Easement Scope Expansion Under Prescriptive Use: The court affirmed the summary judgment, reasoning that the easement, originating from a prescriptive use that established a right-of-way adequate only for the existing agricultural vehicles of that era, could not be unilaterally expanded to accommodate modern, heavier commercial tractor-trailers without permission from the servient estate owner, as such an expansion substantially and unreasonably burdened the servient land beyond the scope established by prescription.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
servitude pouvoir d'examen bien-fonds agricole usage commercial étendue géographique de l'infraction étendue de l'expropriation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is mentioned in order 2.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               %&'%'(() "%*+,%'((,

 "

 "  -"   - - 

'.  /0  $ *  '((, 



1"  " ""  " !  &#  !"#$%



'"#

23333333333   (#





          ! "  #$

   )*+,)  

&#'-#'-".- #"/0# &"1'00'-"-'$2 3-#*4425

0#' #5

  (--"    (# 0#''  0# 36&"  #-7  0#&-8# -"  $9 '&7# *442 1##:"  0-'  $,  &7# *442  # "#""-'(--""1'#'#0#-1-"#"-';( #-#*44<5

-'&0#"-'0#'0#"-&#"*9#-*44<5

 1'#-"#"#0#"-.-0# '-".&'"""'" =*9#- *44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4A'-"&'"""'"("# %3'#&'- '&0"# %3'#B"## 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-% (-#-*44<5

CDDDDDDDDDD1E"66 "0#-7''".1')0-&"1 &-" &'"""'""-&& -"&"/-6-71##:" #-7""-"# &- 5

1-'-"1" #-#"'#.-&""#&%0#' #@

  - " 1  "  -"   - - 

$ 5//   6

7/8   9  6   5: ;+' <=

$@ ' " %  F  G    G      .   &'"""'"=*9#-*44<0#'- " ",2>?4?(#@;4"0'##:"# # 6 %#-'*>444(#@0#&'-0#&-8#('-%(-#-*44<@

*@ '"%HDDDDDDDDDDG .11E66@

,@ 1E'&"".7'-@

2@ -" .1   ')0-&" 1 &-"   "'"-"    #  -" -&& -"&"/-6-70# "##:"""-"#&- @

<@ -".0#' #"6#"-"@

  ),+,)   9@ 00-"-'1#"@<4 -('#&0#"-.10"('#&# #'#'"#0# "##:" -,43'#8'"-(-"-'0#0- #'&& #  #-7(  ##GI-J#'(.-99442   "#'-/&0-#@ -0":"#0#''6 @& &'-#'-"K B--.#/"&". --'#'#" -#'7"-#-"0  --'"". 57B/0'#0'#.&'"-(-"-&0''-#&#"" "# --'5B0'#"#-6"#''#0# ""@G-& &'-# '"-" 0  "#'-  &" & #  ' ""# B 7B " B -)  #-7(  ##0'##0"##&"-8###'#.1- # ##-##7@& &'-##'#&"-'#'#&'E  0# .- #'" 3'-" -- .   --' "".  " 1'00  . " /0 - #'#"A#"@$,*$49"$4?B@





 6#((-#K  # -"K     -## G 7G 







'0-'('#&0# "##:""'"-(- /0#"---.1%1((-(  # #'-0#6#((