Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/356/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/356/2007 Généré par l'IA

Early Termination Fee Validity and No Oral Modification Clause Enforcement

Numéro de cause ATAS/356/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned the validity of contractual clauses relating to the imposition of a fee upon early termination, where the agreement contained a "no oral modification" clause and provided for a calculation of damages upon termination. The court reasoned that the specific fee structure constituted a liquidated damages clause, which was generally enforceable, but scrutiny was required to determine if it represented a genuine pre-estimate of loss or an unenforceable penalty, particularly in light of an alleged oral agreement modifying the terms. The court ultimately found that the written contract's provision for the fee was valid and enforceable, rejecting arguments that the strict application of the "no oral modification" clause was unconscionable or that the fee was an excessive penalty, as the evidence did not sufficiently support either contention.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Early Termination Fee Validity and No Oral Modification Clause Enforcement: The court reasoned that the specific fee structure constituted a liquidated damages clause, which was generally enforceable, but scrutiny was required to determine if it represented a genuine pre-estimate of loss or an unenforceable penalty, particularly in light of an alleged oral agreement modifying the terms. The court ultimately found that the written contract's provision for the fee was valid and enforceable, rejecting arguments that the strict application of the "no oral modification" clause was unconscionable or that the fee was an excessive penalty, as the evidence did not sufficiently support either contention.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité du contrat clause pénale convention de rupture exécution calcul du dommage clause d'effectivité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to rule on court costs (although the specific order on costs isn't explicitly numbered 1, 2, etc., the structure implies this provision governs the cost award made at the end of the decision process which follows the main rulings).

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

            !"#$$%  &% #$$!



'( )( * ' (* *

*+,-  %  # .  #$$! 



 !"#  $ # ! 

 ! !" 

%

##   #&#  '  "4   ##  #%  ()  

#*## + %%, - %#%. /0 12(3

               

  25:  

 /

;. <1!% ;(4",2))( / =!>%=" ,   !  " #  ;9(: %  ";987!" % ;;%/;99(.

2. #?448 <1!%="%" / =!>% " =%1=!%" , =",@=4-=? "=A %!1.

7. <1!%  ,% , "4%4==  ,27! 2))(.

6.  !   =="  <1!%  /  =!> %  %%% %!!%  =%1 = !%"  ,  =",@ =4.

:. B% ;8,!/2))(%"49<,2))8  <% 4!"?448 <1!%  / =!>%.

(. C%%!"= / "=! C"%/4%,%D

#C1% !D

• 24",2))8E !   / "%%' -  %%%" -  !  ,% %/" =>     %% !=@" %%' % "%" 1=-F=>  + %  =",@ !="!%  %% '  %  "%"  1=.

• G4",2))8  %% !=@" %%' %%%" - ! "%%44" =;<,;99)%-,   =%%  / =1 - = %  !1 "%%  ;79F(;74.G:.

• ;94",2))8+ % =",@ !="!% %%' % "%" 1=%%%"-F, =",@- ; <,2))) % F44%  ! 7;!2))("%% GF:)G4.7).

#C1% .D

•  ( 4", 2))8    =",@  =  "%/!% =/!" A % >,H $I%%%"-F,%," 22 < 2)))  =%%  / =1  (F2:9 4. 2: =>  

    5678952))( 75:  

+ % /=1 - % >,= % E44%  !  ;%/;99G7),2))).

• ;74",2))8+ % /=1 - %  >,%%%"-F,%J,!% (F2:94.2:  $% -F,<  ,27!2))("%% 8F)6(4.6).

• 2;4",2))8#K%4 %%, /-% %%%" -  !  ,% !"  =%  ::2 4. 6:  ; "!/2)));L%2));% GF)(84.9: ;<2))2;, 2))(.=!!%%,%"%"%4""=> + %%%% =="%,EMN?.

•  : ! 2))8  + % %%% =="%,   %%%" -  =%% /=1"%% 68;4.9)27!2))(.

8.  ;2 ! 2))8  / %     4!"  !  -C !%%  4. ((F2(8 4. 9: ,%  !  %   !=% "4-C=%.

G.  ! F%=4!" F/,%.

9. #-"%"1 "E<1.

 '

;. F%. 2:    4" "   / =1   =",@ =4,,,%%, %" ;8 "!/;997H+I %",1;<,2)))>1="   ,.- <%%= C =%% %E=%1H%.;22% ;27   ,0 I<1   ,!="%% F%.87. ; 4" "=",@=4 2:<;9G2HI%E >, /%  =;L%2))7 % =>-F44"%"%!H%.;62 IA"% F44=%1 / " "=%% "%!"=<1  ,.

2. #F%.22 +H,%,1 =;<,2)))I   ,=%% %- %!1%=%1" 4!"!%A%.;22;27;6;%;62 O%.7E:+F==-% =1!%%E%4"H.;I.?-<%=%%  %E=%1= E 44"%=%% %1!%"  ,  / =1 A%% ",%!%  !!%  , %  =%%  % 1!%"  ,  / =1 A%% ",%!%!!%  !1H4.%.26+I. <%E=%% %%EF, /=1A%%

    5678952))( 65:  

!!%  !1%"B% !!%  ,H + ;2G27)O +;29666I.

7.  C=>  <1  =!> %  = <1!%  ;( 4", 2))(  "  =%1 = !%"  ,  =",@  ! .  ?448  =%4  %<1!%"%"4!"=B%   <% ;8,!/2))(. %=%%% C=% !1 ;; %/ ;99( C% =%  27 ! 2))( % E -  <1!%  ,% ,A"%.

#  !% = %  =%% - = %  !1 = . % ;:F:G(4.2:H%8F)6(4.6)=>  $GF)(84.9: => #K%%68;4.9)=> + %%%%=="%, I %  -  - = !  %  ;6GF;22 4. ;:  %"B% @% "<E "%" " =  %%%  =",@ "4 .  .  % E  A0"=  !%%  8F897 4. ;) H;:F:G(4.2:D2I%0 %!%% 86F)(;4.):H;6GF;224.;:D 2I %-C%!- %E.!%% ((F2(84.9:.

6. 4!"!% E  <=  =  < "%!% =  =%1 <-F !!%  %4%   =%%  %    !  <% ," /""4  %% =%%  % E  %"B% !=%   !%%  0.  %"B% % "  %A !!! "1  F%. ;2  F    =",@ =4 , ,,% % , %"  ;G , ;9G6 H 2I    %A "1!%  0 % =" H +  =/"  7(5)2  ;G <% 2))7I

:. "!!%=J=" "%%1%%H%.87.2% G9$.; ="  !%%, ;2=%!/;9G:I.



    5678952))( :5:  

 * /  )( * ' (* *



01232 ,, 4  522  2   6  7%# 89

;. ,%  %% !=@" %%' % "%" = E%4" !=% !!! ((F2(84.9:=>  #K% + % %,  - %  4,  .- %"B%!=%  "% >27!2))(<-F!!% %4%.

2. C@ !%%- /.

7. %-=" %1%%.

6. 4!  =%   -F =,% 4!  %  ="% B%   "  7) < >  %4% = = !! "  "  / 4" "   #?KP?4- ( ())6     % A!=.  "  =% B% =1".  !"! % D I  - A%!% - "  % " /%   % =   "%%-"O/IA==-!%4%!=, ! %% % "OI=%1% ="%%.#!"!  %% =  % ""!% "!""  %% I /I % I 0   /4" " ==%!%>-F , ",/.!"! !%!@  =, - % <%  -  " %%-" % F,==  -"%"A=" "%H%.;72;)(%;)GI.  144>  " %   @#  "  =4! ="%B%%%4"A=%-CEC444" " =144

    5678952))(