Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/348/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/348/2005 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Breach Affirmation

Numéro de cause ATAS/348/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed a decision regarding a dispute over contractual obligations where one party alleged breach due to the other's non-performance based on specific terms and corresponding deadlines. The court reasoned that the contract unambiguously established the performance requirements and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure to meet those stipulated terms, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability for the breach because the non-performing party failed to satisfy its clearly defined duties under the agreement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contractual Breach Affirmation: The court reasoned that the contract unambiguously established the performance requirements and that the evidence demonstrated a material failure to meet those stipulated terms, thereby affirming the initial finding of liability for the breach because the non-performing party failed to satisfy its clearly defined duties under the agreement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inexécution d'une obligation contractuelle confirmation de compétence qualification du contrat interprétation de l'arrêt validité de clause compromissoire partie au contrat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the dispositive.
Généré par l'IA
C/13731/2004
Contractual Breach Affirmation
C/17900/2003
Contractual Obligation Interpretation and Breach Affirmation
A/1254/2002
Contractual Breach and Damages Affirmation
A/736/2002
Contract Breach Interpretation and Liability Affirmation
A/1553/2006
Contractual Dispute Interpretation and Breach Affirmation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, which was ordered in the dispositive.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%"&%%' "($)"&%%'



+ *+   +*   

,-  . /  &' 0 &%%' 



   1111111111 



2 !" # " $%"    !* &'()

                 !

   #/+'#  



1 "*  "/'2!3/..-"45 !" # " 6 #27 8 9 % :22   1  2 (! ;<<<<<<<<<<  !!"! " 2= 2  > .- /./,?@ A ": ! " 1B &&-B#  1B&..B#"1  1C2  2 *D)E%": !" 3 D " F

:*1""*  F

"&,!/..0":* G*"%  3"  C:""*  2* *  *H1 ! " "*  )*"8 "/'2!3/..-B$ %) 2"*  )*"8 "/'2!3/..-IF

*2"8 "&/% /..0C: %3  *"F

"  "  J :B 0/ 2! 7 28 "    1*"*   2  D**"" " "?3/...6 92*% J "*  2%KJ*"'.G2% ":22  27" :J "F

"*    D *11":% **J*2%  ":22  F

  :B 0' B &  /    "*     "*    22   1!! 2*  1  !  C *%     :*  : "*% 3*J!! " 1  %) !2  % " %) != " 2% J   2%  K 2"  2%B  : 2 %    "*     "*    22   1!! 2*  1 J:  ! 1! *  J   1   %K  !23B

::27: %J1 %2 3"! "*    D F

*J"** %3F



+,-.+/..0  #'+'#  

*  3  *+   +*   



45676   8  966 6  :! ;,& <

&B * %3F

/B 1!  2  "  J: 2% 1!    2* K "  "*  " '. G "7   1   2 2  !!"* "*   3 1*"* "  58L M81J  ? ?..-       )!2 B  "*   2 K 2D*B  !*!  " N 9 " J )!J"*  "* 3  2""*   J*F 39 )2 2 J ! 1   ! 2%  "!"   "*  F 9 2   D   "  2*B 5   !*!     2    **! *!**   9 39  9  #"   31*"*"22! 7J:  "%"* %3B!*! "! != " 2% J   G     J  "*   J*  :%22 " J**)2*" *6B&'/&.?&.@9B  D11 7N  * "N   =5 * (   

2 1!"2*K 1 *)2   J:C:11 1*"* "*23 J2D11



+,-.+/..0