Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/34/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/34/2006 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Admission Sufficiency of Evidence Review Standard

Numéro de cause ATAS/34/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A lower court incorrectly granted summary judgment against a party appealing a denial of relief for a judicial admission, based on an alleged failure to timely object to the admissibility of the admission, because the court applied the wrong standard for review; the appellate court determined that the failure to timely object to the evidence did not automatically waive the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, which requires evidence that is probative and legally competent, rather than merely inadmissible.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judicial Admission Sufficiency of Evidence Review Standard: A lower court incorrectly granted summary judgment against a party appealing a denial of relief for a judicial admission, based on an alleged failure to timely object to the admissibility of the admission, because the court applied the wrong standard for review; the appellate court determined that the failure to timely object to the evidence did not automatically waive the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment, which requires evidence that is probative and legally competent, rather than merely inadmissible.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
suffisance des preuves contrôle juridictionnel inexploitabilité des preuves illicites preuve insuffisante d'aggravation médicale exceptions procédurales tardives recours contre décision de renvoi

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/1493/2001
Sufficiency of Evidence Review on Appeal
A/2249/2004
Discovery Violation and Evidentiary Admission Challenge
C/9467/2011
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Lack of Substantiated Grounds and Conclusion
A/1270/2003
Evidence Admissibility and Sufficiency in Criminal Appeal
C/27528/2018
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Failure to Prove Irreparable Harm from Evidentiary Rulings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court orders the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

     

   

#$%%$#&''( )#%$#&''*

)

! )! +)"  !+ "+

+,  -  -. /0 &''*

  

  !"!#

"#!

$  % & !   ! '(%  )"# '*+'% &#&. '(*,   -

            !" 

2 */0 2

 1 )! .&&"  *( 3& *,,+%  & $  4&2)!5  &6  &7"!.   89 &#  & :!!  &&#. 3"!&5! 5  '; 3&# *,,+% #&# 89 )":&# #!:&!   ! 9 ": #&:&#. )#. <  )&#. # < " .##  #.=

 9&#.!.  7"!. "))"&#&"  '* 3&# *,,+=

9)!5 :"&! )!& "& 9 !))"!# .#>& )!  $?)&#@ &:!&#&!  5: 4$6  A "B# *,,+   ! 9 )!".! %  & % )! .&&" ! "))"&#&"  '! ":>! *,,+% !"  !"&#  9&#.!. <  &&#. 3"!&5!  +,C 5  '; 3&# *,,+=

 9&#.!.  &#!3#. !"!  ( .>! *,,+% .D# E#! #"## &)>  #!:&!= 89 )!.& )! &! :"&! !#&!.  .&&" "#&7&. )! F  A ":>! *,,+=

9&:&#. <  .#!&!%  &  " )!&&)# < 9&!!:>&&#.  !"! # >&&&!# < " !3#= 8 !&D# )!& )!5   "#% & 9:5!  77# 8  )& "## &# .&&"  .#. !#&!.  0 ":>! *,,+=

+   1  "& D:"& ! G"!D&#&" 3&&&! 46  .#. "&7&. #  &#&#.% 5  '! "B# *,,1%  !&> #"  ! "&% ")".  + 3D% "#  )!.&# #  :&2)!.&#% + )).# # '; 3D ! 4!#H ' #H ! # +; 6=

 &# < G#&"  G.#&"  '; 3D !% )!  !&> 7..!  *I 3:&! *,,0 4 J '1,  ',;6%  ! "& D:"&  ")#.%  '1 7.:!&!%  &)"&#&" #!&#"&! !D# )!###  !&> #"  ! "&  &.D!  ! < #!"& 3D #&#&!% %  G###  G.#&"  ":@ 3D !=

 "7"!.# < 9!#H +; H ' #H  KH 0 %  !&> #"  ! "& "L#  &# &8  "###&" )!.: < G!#H +;   "& 7..! !  )!#& D..!  !"&#  ! "&  ; "#">! *,,, #!.  :&D!  '! 3:&! *,,1 4 6% 8& "# !#&: <  "& 7..! ! G!2&  '( ! 'AA0 4 6=

  ").# )"! 3D!   G)5 # && .#>&=

9@ #!  9!#H ;,  %  !"! "&# E#! .)".   #!# 3"! &:#  "#&7&#&"   .&&" 3## < !"!=

/0110/*,,+

2 1/0 2

9 9)5% & # .#>& 8  .&&" ! "))"&#&"  '! ":>! *,,+  .#. "#&7&. < 9&#.!.  0 ":>! *,,+% # " )  A% # 89.D. )! 9&#.!.=

  .&  #!# 3"! # && .K  &K 0 .>! *,,+ 4!#H 1( H '  6=

 " #! # !)"!#.  )!&! 3"! ":!> 8& &#% "&#  & + .>! *,,+=

 7"!  ".8 #  "##! 8  !"! &#!3#.  ( .>! *,,+ # #!&7=

/0110/*,,+

2 0/0 2

 + ")2  )! +)"  !+ "+



345   6  7   89 -*& ":

'H .!  !"! &!!:> )"!   #!&:#.H

*H &# 8  )!".! # D!#&#H

1H 7"!  )!#&   8G ):# 7"!! !"! "#!  )!.# !!E#   .&  1, 3"! 5  "#&7&#&" )! )& !". !.  !&> 7..!  !% FKM&N!K"78& ;% ;,,0   %  #!"& @)&!H  .&  )# E#! )!""D.H  ."&! "&# O 6 &&8!

@## 8 .&&"  !"!# .&! ">#&!  & # )   .&&" ##8.= >6 @)"! )"! 8 "#&7 & #& )":"&! ! ## #! .&&"= 6 )"!#!  &D#! "   " !)!.##H F&  ."&!  "#&# )  #!"& ..# ..!. " ##! 6 >6 # 6 &2%  !&> 7..!  !  )"!! ) #!!  #&5! !  !"! 8G& :! .!! &!!:>H  ."&!  !"! #&"! "!  "P  )!:% 8& !"# 3"&#% && 8  .&&" ##8. # G:"))  8   .#. @).&.  !"!# 4!#H '1*% ',; # ',( 6H

 D!77&5!  !.&#

!&2"&  Q "!& R   

 ")& "7"!  )!.# !!E# # "#&7&. @ )!#& && 8G< G77& 7..!   #. )>&8 )!  D!77

/0110/*,,+