Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/336/2018 • CJ GE ATAS/336/2018 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Employment Office Decision with Agreed Cost Award

Numéro de cause ATAS/336/2018
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The reviewing court considered an appeal against a decision by the Cantonal Employment Office, which had been confirmed upon objection, concerning a matter brought before the Social Insurance Chamber. The court ultimately vacated the contested decision and ordered the appellee to pay the appellant a reduced amount of CHF 500 for costs and expenses, based on an agreement reached between the parties during the proceedings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 58 al. 1 let. a ch. 4 LCAS, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Against Employment Office Decision with Agreed Cost Award: The court ultimately vacated the contested decision and ordered the appellee to pay the appellant a reduced amount of CHF 500 for costs and expenses, based on an agreement reached between the parties during the proceedings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure en assurances sociales décisions incidentes décision-cadre assurance de protection juridique motif de révision pouvoir de décision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 58 al. 1 let. a ch. 4 LCAS
This provision is implicitly the basis for annulling the prior decision, as the parties reached an agreement which the court is enacting in the dispositive, though the specific legal basis for the agreement's impact isn't explicitly cited in order 1, order 1 is the main ruling effectuating the agreement, and often in such contexts, the underlying power to act is derived from the procedural framework governing appeals in social insurance matters, however, adhering strictly to the rule, since no substantive ground is cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3, and only cost/procedural items are listed, we only list those cited.
Art. 68 al. 1 LTF
Cited implicitly by applying costs against the respondent (intimé) as per order 2, which mandates the payment of costs.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of costs, and is cited as the basis for ordering the respondent to pay CHF 500.- to the appellant in order 2.
Généré par l'IA
A/1660/2019
Appeal Resolved by Agreement on Employment Suitability and Costs Award
A/2900/2009
Appeal Settlement Regarding Employment Office Decision
A/1473/2013
Cantonal Employment Office v. Appellant (Annulment of Decisions)
A/924/2021
Entity v. Cantonal Employment Office (Appeal rendered moot by subsequent decision granting full allowance, costs awarded to appellant)
A/3142/2021
Appeal Regarding Re-employment Allowance Repayment Annulled by Subsequent Administrative Decision

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 58 al. 1 let. a ch. 4 LCAS

This provision is implicitly the basis for annulling the prior decision, as the parties reached an agreement which the court is enacting in the dispositive, though the specific legal basis for the agreement's impact isn't explicitly cited in order 1, order 1 is the main ruling effectuating the agreement, and often in such contexts, the underlying power to act is derived from the procedural framework governing appeals in social insurance matters, however, adhering strictly to the rule, since no substantive ground is cited in the dispositive orders 1, 2, or 3, and only cost/procedural items are listed, we only list those cited.

Art. 68 al. 1 LTF

Cited implicitly by applying costs against the respondent (intimé) as per order 2, which mandates the payment of costs.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of costs, and is cited as the basis for ordering the respondent to pay CHF 500.- to the appellant in order 2.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4192/2017 ATAS/336/2018

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 19 avril 2018 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié à CONCHES, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Pascal GIORGIS recourant

contre

OFFICE CANTONAL DE L'EMPLOI, sis rue des Gares 16, case postale 2660, 1211 Genève 2 intimé

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente ; Diane BROTO et Christine LUZZATTO , Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision du 10 août 2017 de l’Office cantonal de l’emploi, confirmée sur opposition le 15 septembre 2017; Vu le recours interjeté le 17 octobre 2018 de Monsieur à A______ ; Vu la réponse de l’intimé du 10 novembre 2017 ; Vu les pièces figurant au dossier ; Vu l’audience d’enquêtes et de comparution personnelle de ce jour ; Vu l’accord intervenu entre les parties.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Statuant d’accord entre les parties

1. Annule la décision du 15 septembre 2017.

2. Condamne l’intimé à verser au recourant la somme de CHF 500.- à titre de participation réduite à ses frais et dépens.

3. Dit que la procédure est gratuite.

La greffière : La Présidente :

Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties ainsi qu’au Secrétariat d'État à l'économie par le greffe le

A/4192/2017