Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/333/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/333/2007 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Sale Voided for Insufficient Public Notice

Numéro de cause ATAS/333/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party sought to set aside a judicial sale concerning property, claiming the procedure resulted in a significant undervaluation due to procedural defects, primarily an insufficient public notice period that deterred potential bidders, which was contrary to the statutory requirements intended to ensure fair market price realization. The court reasoned that while the statute mandated a specific minimum notice period before the sale, which was demonstrably not met, the mere fact that the property sold for less than the appealing party desired did not automatically establish prejudice or nullify the sale unless there was proof that the defect directly prevented a higher bid, ultimately concluding that the lack of adherence to the mandatory notice period required voiding the sale to protect the integrity of the public bidding process and the rights of the debtor.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judicial Sale Voided for Insufficient Public Notice: The court reasoned that while the statute mandated a specific minimum notice period before the sale, which was demonstrably not met, the mere fact that the property sold for less than the appealing party desired did not automatically establish prejudice or nullify the sale unless there was proof that the defect directly prevented a higher bid, ultimately concluding that the lack of adherence to the mandatory notice period required voiding the sale to protect the integrity of the public bidding process and the rights of the debtor.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
annonces publiques réalisation forcée d'immeubles droit à la propriété condition légale valeur au cours exclusion du soumissionnaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision dictates the allocation of court costs, which is done in the final order.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                ! "### 

$$%"

 "$ &' (&"&' % $&(% ( '%

()*     *   



  !"!#



"#!

  $$       $    $ % #(0 &'(!#("%!"# )*+,%&"#%-.--   /

        Christine BULLIARD et Bertrand REICH    

   4.154  

!"!%!0&"#&(6"(!7

8(9"!%:&(#(""0&!!"!##(;"!#(" !<&! !(=7

 8"! (#!> #!  &!#(%    ?   !"(# : "#(" ;(( &"! @0&":   !"!# = ">!# &"!  "(  9>(! # ;0>!(!.33/%&"!?>!(#*#!0&"0&!6$ A%#? ?#("!"(#!"!#:"#(";((&"!"(&#=! .33+ B"C0 #!(#0D "(# "! *#! (>#(C0 &!  ( # #!)0 &!  0(("9##E!"!%?!&!0##(@#CC0E;(!7

$ (% +" , '% "$ &' (&"&' % $&(% ( '%

 -../   0

1./2/** 3 -4 5! 6 '7

-' "#E(#"C>"("&#("%"(#&"!$ A "  A %   ?@ 0((" ! ! "!#  !"(#   !"!#:"#("&"!"(&#=!.33+'

.' 8F"##?="('

5' 0!>!"(#0&": @C(#"(9>(!#;0>!(! .33/%#(>(#E0&"!="#;"!&!6$ A'

,' "#E!"!#?@@&@#!&!0##("E;(!>"(! !&!0#!"!'

+' (#?&!"0!#C!#(#'

/' &&(#("8!#'+3 %(;"!&!#(?8&>#;"!! !"!"#!&!0#!!*#0(539"!6"#(;(#("&!&( !"0!0 !(=;00!!%$)G(H!)";?(/%/33,   %#!"(:&(!'0(&#*#!&!""C0'0"(!"(#I D((?!:##?0(("!"!#0(!"=#(!(#& 0(("##?07=D:&"!&"!?"#(;(#(&">"(!!## #!0(("7D&"!#!(C#!""!&!0##'$(0"(!



1,,2-1.33/  45154   "#(# &  #!"( 00# 00!0 " ##! D =D # D (4%  !(=;00!!&"!!&#!!#(6!!!"!?8( >!0!!(!!>='0"(!!"!#("!"!"F  &!>% ?( !"# 9"(#% (( ?  0((" ##?0 # 8>"&&  ?0#0:&0(0!"!#B!#'-5.%-3/#-3JD'



    C!;;(!I !0(#I       (!! $ =$

"&(";"!&!0#!!*##"#(;(0:&!#(#E@;;(&!C!;;





1,,2-1.33/