Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/319/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/319/2005 Généré par l'IA

Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement

Numéro de cause ATAS/319/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a dispute over the proper scope of a statutory provision regarding the enforcement of judgments, specifically challenging whether a certain procedural step was validly taken. The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Statutory Interpretation of Directory vs. Mandatory Procedural Requirements in Judgment Enforcement: The court reasoned that the procedural requirement at issue was directory rather than mandatory, as a strict interpretation would lead to an unduly harsh result and the underlying purpose of the statute was satisfied by the action taken, thus upholding the validity of the enforcement procedure despite the technical deviation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
demande d'interprétation condition de recevabilité exécution étendue du devoir légal interprétation et application strictes action en constatation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Costs were imposed on the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/781/2005
Statutory Interpretation Regarding Formal Validity and Enforcement of Legal Instruments
A/1808/2002
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Transaction Classification
A/724/2007
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Contract and Property Disputes
A/1138/2005
Statutory Interpretation and Administrative Regulation Compliance
A/1850/2006
Statutory Interpretation and Procedural Compliance in Commercial Appeals

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Costs were imposed on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%$&''(  $)*%$&''(



+  ,+ ! -  +! -! 

&.  /0   *% 1 &''( 



  2222222222  $

 !"#$#%&&&&&&&&&&' ()



$ 

34!  5 !   -3 - 6  $0#  3 -     -   " '$*+,-./

            ! "#

   *215*  

"# #6 $""00!7# 8 $942 '"2:$7 2335 $"# 66$": "#07 233;<

  "5:"#07 233;$ #6": (#/  2334<

6." <

""06 $6 "6 $$"8=>$",0 $:2 / 2334< $$"=8-8"$$" . ""# #=8/"= /$#$#"$6 ?9&&&&&&&&&&$"00$#0"807"  $$"@6$( -8"",0 23346 ?0 &&&&&&&&&&$$$=$$" . /$6 -$060  "#=$=8#!!! /6/$>$  $" $=8 $ $ $ 67$#< / $ $  "/$7A$9

 ! - 3   ,+ ! -  +! -! 



7/8   9  :   ;# *<& -=>

:9 $-"=8 -8$7# 8 $942 '- 8$  " ?"0 &&&&&&&&&&  $$ =8  ! "  #$# %&&&&&&&&&&' 9

29 #="# 66$": "#07 233;9

59 $$=  $"/7A$9

;9 $=6 #" $! $$9

49 66$"8 $943 ( 06 $"=86/$( 0   $ 6 #$ >$""#"53A ".$($6 6 00"#" # 7(#"# " 'BCD B(=EE33;   $ @06 9"#6$>$ 6 !#90#0 "$F )"= @$0$="#  $"# 7$ $6" "#$$=#<7)@6 6 =0$($06/ "0" $$



1+12334  *515*   $ "#<)6 $ !$ " 6 #$$9'0#0  $$ 6  $  ##0$ #0# #  $$  ) 7) $ ) *"  7(#"# " 6 6$  0$.    =8 "/ "#   /790#0 "  0$  0G " 6 / =  $ A$  =  "# $$=# $ 8/66 " =#$#@6#"#  $ $9:52:3E$:3,)9





    ! (( F  #"$F     77       

6( 0"6 #$ >$$$(#@6 $=8-8(((#"#  " 6 ! ((





1+12334