Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/302/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/302/2006 Généré par l'IA

Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Undisclosed Former Representative and Prior Settlement to Impeach Credibility

Numéro de cause ATAS/302/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged a lower court's decision to admit evidence related to an undisclosed former representative, arguing the trial court erred by permitting testimony that referenced a prior settlement agreement with that representative, which they claimed was irrelevant and prejudicial. The court reasoned that while the specific dollar amount of the settlement was properly excluded, the fact of the prior relationship and settlement was relevant to challenge the credibility and bias of a testifying witness who had previously dealt with that representative, and thus its limited probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect, supporting the trial court's discretionary decision to admit testimony concerning the existence of the past relationship.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Undisclosed Former Representative and Prior Settlement to Impeach Credibility: The court reasoned that while the specific dollar amount of the settlement was properly excluded, the fact of the prior relationship and settlement was relevant to challenge the credibility and bias of a testifying witness who had previously dealt with that representative, and thus its limited probative value outweighed any prejudicial effect, supporting the trial court's discretionary decision to admit testimony concerning the existence of the past relationship.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
crédibilité des témoins moyens de preuve sans pertinence force probante partie à la procédure inexploitabilité des preuves illicites gestion de sinistres

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
A/28/2004
Appeal Regarding Exclusion of Evidence of Settlement Negotiations and Prior Inconsistent Statements
A/4263/2005
Evidence Admissibility in Subsequent Proceeding Despite Prior Exclusion
A/1534/2006
Admission of Remote Prior Conviction for Impeachment
A/1826/2002
Prior Consistent Statements Admissibility to Rebut Fabrication Claim
A/1210/2006
Prior Testimony Admissibility Under Confrontation Clause

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the losing party to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%$&#'%%( )#*%'#'%%&

"")

 )"  + )   " + +

+,  $  ''  '%%& 



 ! "



!" 

##     $ %%    &  0"01 '!()&*!"+,-&.,..   ./





))   -)

           !" 

   5,2/5    *  ! 0   ,( !"!6  ,33-&    70  06  1810! " !  100! 79$0$0""0! !"" 8:

$  9!0"   "0;0" 10   *!0007  10  <=*0"> 0? 0"0   @?  ,) !"!6  ,33-& """" 7  *0"1  " ?0 "   .  !?6   ,. !?6  ,33-&  0! $ A!*0"0"0!    ?010!"0 :

 *  ! 0  %  /. !"!6  ,33-&  B ;;  06  1  0;! 1 $ 17$>" !0& ! ?0"!"0 !0!&>*!1 0";0"!!"0;0?!71&"7$!*0100!0"0B0?0" C" 9!0":

$10.+!?6 ,33-1"10* "0D$0"1 1*! $'!;!  &! *0$0 ?600"1:

! 0 %&! "0 1&1"1 "! 1B ;; 06:

* ! 0 ,16 ,33-&B ;;! 1D$0"1 1 0 10 .-16 ,33-:

$0"1 1$"*0;"1:



+ " )  ")

 !;! 1" D $ "E -4 &  06 "!    !0 !F"&0"07&!"""0!* 1?D$ "E-4!0;11   * "0B11  !0" !0G H4!"!6 ,333 "0?D !0;11  $ 50?00"1.(90.(-(5 :

!*1"*! 9B I*@"001"60:

$>" $ "EJ("E6H"H!0 * !1 00" "0?., *"6 .(J-G H&! ! !0"!*! " >*!10" ;0"!!"0;0?!71007!0!:

&1A1"&100!""71"*0@0?!71!"9!0":

!;! 1"D$ "EJ(E/ & 060* "0D$0"1 110 .+ !?6  ,33-& *0  .- 16  ,33- *!   !;!   > @B "0!1&!*0$0 ?600"1:

$0"1 1$"*0;"1:



2+3+42,33-  5/2/5  

" + )-  )"  + )   " + +



./0   1  2   34 5&'  6



.E 1  ! 0 ?6E

,E ;!   * "0   7I *?" ;!   !  !"   * 1"  C"   10  /3 9!  @  !"0;0"0! *  *0 !1  1  06 ;11    & %AK0L A!;70 4& 433+   &  " !0 >*0 E  10  *" C"  * !!B1E  1!0  !0"M H 007  >""7100! ! "10 !6"0 0"*100! ""71: 6H >*!  *!  7 !"0; 0 "0 *!?!0    "" "  100!: H *! "   0B"  !   ! * 1""E %0  1!0   !"0" *  " !0 11" 11 1 ! ""  H 6H " H 05&  06;11  *! *"  "0@   ! 7I0 ? 1  0 ?6E1!0  ! "0! ! !'  * ?& 70  !" 9!0"& 00 7  100! ""71 " I?!  71"1>*101 ! "G "E./,&.34".3JHE  B ;;0   * 10"         N0    0      

!*0!;! * 1" C""!"0;01>* "0007IDI;;0;11   !0* B ;;



2+3+42,33-