Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/249/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/249/2006 Généré par l'IA

Contractor Delay vs. Owner Authorization Failure in Construction Contract Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/249/2006
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute involved a construction contract where the contractor alleged the owner breached by failing to provide necessary authorizations in a timely manner, leading to delays and increased costs, and the owner counterclaimed for liquidated damages due to the contractor's delayed completion. The court examined whether the owner's actions constituted a compensable delay or a non-compensable delay excusing liquidated damages, focusing on the contract's provisions regarding notice and the allocation of risk for unforeseen delays. The court determined that the owner's procedural failures regarding authorization requests were non-compensable events under the contract terms, thus upholding the application of liquidated damages against the contractor for the ultimate delay in completion.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 LTF; Contractor Delay vs. Owner Authorization Failure in Construction Contract Dispute: The court examined whether the owner's actions constituted a compensable delay or a non-compensable delay excusing liquidated damages, focusing on the contract's provisions regarding notice and the allocation of risk for unforeseen delays. The court determined that the owner's procedural failures regarding authorization requests were non-compensable events under the contract terms, thus upholding the application of liquidated damages against the contractor for the ultimate delay in completion.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contrat de construction retards de procédure action en indemnité construction illicite nullité du contrat notion de pouvoir adjudicateur

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to decide on the court costs of the appeal proceedings.
Art. 64 LTF
Applied to decide on the request for legal aid for the appellant.
Généré par l'IA
A/3945/2006
Owner v. Contractor: Breach of Construction Contract and Termination Validity
A/330/2005
Construction Contract Breach and Damages
C/24343/2007
Contractor Delay Penalties and Modification Costs Dispute
C/26526/2010
Owner v. Contractor: Termination for Breach and Reimbursement of Completion Costs
C/3387/2014
Contractor v. Homeowner: Breach of Contract and Procedural Default

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to decide on the court costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 64 LTF

Applied to decide on the request for legal aid for the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               $%&'($)+  $)%,$)&



- !.-    -   !

/01 + # 2+ 0 )&



  !





!

""       "   #  $% !./ !&!'($)!+,$-*--   *



           ! "#

   5*0'5   #  3 6    &//7/ % %.!/ % 89.:%-;*((,,(<*(('=

>%/)/<%.%%>%.!/%89.:-.*((4=

)%/%-;!*((4$ ""       "   #   ?5)@ A  B$   %//  %! C >%.!/ % 89.: /!!<.!-;*((,!;6>,(<*((4$.!76>%)! ;6>C !! %@ %! %> & C D C ED5!  E <  7.!6%<!F!%//..%.$%!6> .)!)%!/:!<%.)%!C>%.!/% 89.:=

)%/))!%*+<.&*((4$;!/5=

>/!!!%/)!%*1%/.&*((4$G, ;<*((1$!.)!.!C!=

>!./,-;<*((1;!%=

#   6   :<  H:! ;% ?B  /!/ .%7/ !  !!/$ %@  - I! *((,$  & ! %  $.)/%4;:$%!)/%!!<5)/%!$4))/!! -1;:?!J-!J!41 B=

 ! C H! % H/! % -1 ;: $ )  & 7/%/*2;<*(('? E-,(-(1B$% :<%)!/$ -, 7/<$%)!!!:!).!!! &!%   % /:   C ! ;: !!$ $ % H!!!%H/!%<K;:=

 7./.! C >!J 41 J - !J  8J 3 $  & ! % L!!6%!!!)/<CH!J41 % 7/%/)!://%%1!&*((( ? B6! !<C7/%/H589.:&:!! H%.!/%H<&!/%*4;-+3*? B=

.)/!);:%%H)@!/!&=

   ;)%$  !!/  )! %  %/ % !!!$%!J'+J* !*4J*<>!J4J- !J&%7/%/)/%%.!!<%*(%/.&-+13? B$ 6 6> K!  !/F! %: % )!! C  !!! ../%! % >K!  % >K! %> ))! % %!$ C <  !/F! ! % %!%7!$6>))!)%!&!/F!)&)</$!C



0'1230*((4  5,0'5   %!6!!/F!%:%)!!))F!)/</.D %>%/7.!$>!5C5% !!!<%%!%>&:!? E -*+*+(%J*J-$-*1,(,%J*B=

> !/F! %: % )!! ! /:.! K:/ 6 >!!/ %  %/%!!!)6F!%>%.!/.%>77? E-,( ,+-J%J*J'B=

> M%/M 6  .%7 ) < 77! &:! ! %!.! !:!  )/!! < C >!// ?) K.)  %.!/ % 89.:B ! !D)6.! % ! !!! !  !7! ) C >K: %> !/F! %: % )!!$ % ! 6> >! ) !!6& %<!  !!/;%!?F!)&/% &7/%/%% -*!&*((4$-3,0('$%J*J*B=

>  & 7/%/ %   ;:/$ %  % F! !/$ 6 6%89.:%/;C/C>/%%.!/%89.:$ M%/M%/!%!C>%.!/%89.:<77!/!!7<F!  !@ ).! !!!$ )6>  .%7 ) < 77! &:! %!.! !:!  %! % >/ K )!! %/;C %/=

%89.:!%.%7!!;%6%/!% %/ ?.!/B %>! % >%.!/ % 89.:$    7!/ % /.!!!%)!!%/;C)GK%!6)/%!C /<!%%/%.!!<!/7=

>M%/M!!!%%/%!K)!!%/;C/ !7! ) /6! ) C >K: % >!/F! %: % )!!$ % ! 6 >!!/ ;% % ).@ !  %! ) !  .!@   7./!!M%/M?F!% &7/%/% )&/)/!/%J,B=

>>$>!./>!)//.!!!/%%/! %!C%%.!/;@%/;C/$)M%/M%-;!*((4$ 7./  )  M%/M  ))! % *+ <.& *((4$  < /./7..!!!!%)!!%/;C)G=

>>:!%>%/%!!!6>!/F!%:%)!! ..%=

 7./.! C  ;)% )/!/$  <! %@  % %/ 6!!>!))!&%>$%!65%!F!%// <&=



0'1230*((4  5'0'5   !!!7)&!/%7))!$)%>!;!  /8/! $ !  /<! %/  !!! % )!! %I.!)G%>!./=

   !4  !.-    -   !

#

56300 7  8   9: 2&) ";

-J /<&J

*J !6)/%!:!!J

,J 7.  )! %  6H )<! 7.  !  )/! F! %  %/ % ,( ; %@  !7! ) ) ..%/ %/  & 7/%/ % $ "8NO876 1$ 1(('   $  ! K.)J  %/  )! F! ):/J  ./. %!A B %6 K!.!6%/!%/&!!)%%/ !!6/= &B K) ) 6 .!7  !. )< %.% !! ! %/= B )!  :!   %  )/!!J "  ./.  !!)!//.!/.//!!B&B!B5%$ & 7/%/ %   ) ) !  .!@    6H %< %/ <&J  ./. %  .!   .D % )<$6!;!$6%/!!6/!H<))%6 /!/K)/%/!?!J-,*$-(1!-(3BJ  :77@  /%!A       PQ R D       

 )7.% )/! F!!!7/K)!!"/!!%H !!C H/.):77



0'1230*((4