Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/239/2005 • CJ GE ATAS/239/2005 Généré par l'IA

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Numéro de cause ATAS/239/2005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerns a challenge to a statute imposing mandatory minimum prison terms, where the statute's application resulted in a disproportionately severe sentence for the defendant given the nature of their offense. The court reasoned that while legislative intent to ensure uniformity and deter crime is valid, the mandatory imposition of a minimum term, without regard to mitigating circumstances or the proportionality of the sentence to the specific crime committed, resulted in cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional prohibitions, thus mandating the invalidation of the sentence under the facts presented.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Mandatory Minimum Sentencing as Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The court reasoned that while legislative intent to ensure uniformity and deter crime is valid, the mandatory imposition of a minimum term, without regard to mitigating circumstances or the proportionality of the sentence to the specific crime committed, resulted in cruel and unusual punishment in violation of constitutional prohibitions, thus mandating the invalidation of the sentence under the facts presented.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
peine minimale proportionnalité de la peine circonstance atténuante caractère obligatoire droit pénitentiaire aggravation de la peine

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article governs the allocation of court costs, which was applied in the final order regarding the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               #$%%#&'# (#%)*#%&&'

( + (

, ( , +(-  ,+ -+ 

%.  /0   )&  %&&' 



12222222222  34 2222222222 ! "#$ #  $#%""& $ ' (   !# 



# 

-55 + +(-  3,+6 7  ($ " "% )#*+,-!



           !"

   '0.3'  

$%$#  "45$6#% "##""$"   $" $76  $  89999999999  '"   $"! 6  $#   # :

6$7 :

##" "#$$"!6 $# # "";$89999999999:

$""###" "#$7 <  7##" "#:

$"66 # 7$"$#% "#$%$ ";"7   $ $31%011=:

$ ; # $   $" "    #!     " ; #   66"6"" #> .?+0@.13"# " $<;7, #"$$""#$6"" "!$ :

$;"#   % $ $!  A :

B $"#$ "C$:

$; # %B%#%D$6"  ;7"< "6"$ " ";  # "# #  D    #; '"  $6"" "!   D #":

 7 E ?= $  #"   #$ $%""  "! ;" !#"   #"C""  $ $   <;7, $#"  <5 $    #$ "!"  # $%""  "! )   ""$ <$""   #$   $  $!    #" :

7 6# "#"  "# $     #"C #;    #$ #  $! %B% #" :

7" #!"  #;$$   <;7,$#" <5$ 766""# :



  ./00.0112  '3.3'    + -( 5  ( , +(-  ,+ -+ 



9/4   :  ;   3" <$% -=

?E $#"#$#$" "#$7 E?= <;7,$#"  <5$> .?+0@.13E

0E 6#%   " $  ;7 !  6#% # #     B  $  $" $ ?1 <# $-  # "6" "#  " #%%$ $  "C 6$ $  F4G"H4#6;" / /11=     #" D%"E  $"    B  ##5E  %%#" $#" I J "$"; D % ;$""## $"#C "" $$""#  ;: CJ D# # ; %# "6 "  "% #!#" $%$     $""#: J #   "5  #  $ #   E F"  %%#"  # "   #" %  % #   J CJ   J "'$  "C 6$ $   #     % "-   # ;7" $! $ "!CE  %%#" $ # % "# #  %#) $ !;"# <#" "";$""# ; 7!#$;  D$"# K E?30?1/ ?1@JE    566"I  "$ I   "" CC#"                #"#6#%$ B  # "6"D """;7,766"6$ $#"566

  ./00.0112