Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/220/2004 • CJ GE ATAS/220/2004 Généré par l'IA

Contract Term Interpretation: Condition Precedent vs. Covenant

Numéro de cause ATAS/220/2004
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court was asked to review a decision regarding a dispute over whether a particular contract term was a condition precedent or a covenant, specifically concerning a requirement for prompt notification of any changes in the underlying agreement. The court reasoned that the language used, particularly the requirement for notice "forthwith" or "immediately," coupled with the significant consequences attached to non-compliance, indicated the parties intended the notification requirement to be a condition precedent to the other party's continuing obligations, meaning failure to provide timely notice excused the other party from performance.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Term Interpretation: Condition Precedent vs. Covenant: The court reasoned that the language used, particularly the requirement for notice "forthwith" or "immediately," coupled with the significant consequences attached to non-compliance, indicated the parties intended the notification requirement to be a condition precedent to the other party's continuing obligations, meaning failure to provide timely notice excused the other party from performance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
interprétation du contrat notification des ententes dette durable revirement de jurisprudence voie d'exécution procédure préjudicielle d'urgence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court explicitly ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

               "#$%"%&&# "%%&"%&&#

''

 '( ( (  '(  

#)  *+ 

 , - %&&# 



  .......... !"#$  "%& "  '% ()*+,*-+   



" 

// ( (  0'(1(2& ( (# ."/+,*-01%



            !

     2*302  

  &((" &  455(  "  6(21  7   8(  *--0 "&  9 :&# ;;;;;;;;;;  &#(2  &<(%(&(  &1  ,  #= *--->

4""( ("5"#4*-"? *--0>

&(("&4 &@8%(*--A8  4""( (">

  " ( 8   4    < "( (" !"# $   ,@8%( *--A "  9 4 (" &  &(("    %"( &   9 4( (#B( B55& (=&"C 3DD3*--A>

&(("&4 &5%(*--A" (5(9#& (&"  %"( (=& &(("&8( *--0 @8%( *--A>

  " ( 8   4  A # *--A B(  "  "E &  3A@*3*--A  )  4"" 9 4 (" & &(("   9  ( & 4(  ("4 >

<F & (=&&0,#*--A"E 3DD3*--A   &&(("&<  & ""=8 >



3  3)4G #&4 (@0E0&"(5& ( B&&"( &"(&H" "=*---6 7 %(B ,8%(*--04 8)494%"(&"%(94 "( &" "(&&((""&(("""( ("" )"  5"#>

"%&(("&"( F " (5(G ((F " 9"( &4 "( &"65EI(55*-A-& (("  (G7>

  4">

4 ""( ("    F  5"# "    &((" )(   &1 " 8  9 "65E E@HE, >I(55*-A-& (("  (G7>

"%&(("# 5(( (B)&#"J""&G "("&" >

  (= &   "    F  & 0, # *--A    C 3DD3*--A)" %( "=  (5 ("K



  20302   " &")"=8  4( (#"&#9%& &9" >

&"&( (" " B# "=8 >



 '  /  '( ( (  '(  

 *343   5  633 3  78 9:% 

,E "=8 "5"#:# ;;;;;;;;;;" &(("& 4 &5%(*--A>

*E .&L>

0E  5"# (&)4% 5"#""  F  &  &( & 0- 8" &1  " (5( ("  ( "##& &  (=5&&$IM(NI"5)(HH--A   "( G#(E  &(    F  ""BE  ##"( &"(  K 7 (&() G #  ) &(("  "  &( "= (  (    &  &((" )>=7G"")#" (5( (#"%"(&#&   &((">7" (B "&"  E$(##"( " (  "(# #" 7=7 7(2& (= 5& &   "     # (1   " )4(&%&(%=E##"(&"# ("" #".&%)(" 8"( (()&((" ) 4%" &) G&(" 6 E,0*,-H ,-D7E





B55(K (& K  O(&  :  (  





"("5"#& F  " (5(G ((()49455(5& &"(B55