Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/217/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/217/2007 Généré par l'IA

Governmental Entity v. Contractor: Recovery of Liquidated Damages

Numéro de cause ATAS/217/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A governmental entity initiated an action to recover funds disbursed under two different contracts, arguing that the receiving party failed to meet certain performance metrics, resulting in the imposition of liquidated damages. The court determined that the statutory provisions governing the contracts did not authorize the imposition of liquidated damages, but instead permitted recovery of actual damages resulting from the breach. Since the entity sought to enforce a specific contract clause that was legally invalid, the court concluded that the entity was not entitled to recover the specific liquidated amounts, and therefore, the decision to deny recovery was affirmed based on the lack of statutory or contractual authority for the claimed damages.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Governmental Entity v. Contractor: Recovery of Liquidated Damages: The court determined that the statutory provisions governing the contracts did not authorize the imposition of liquidated damages, but instead permitted recovery of actual damages resulting from the breach. Since the entity sought to enforce a specific contract clause that was legally invalid, the court concluded that the entity was not entitled to recover the specific liquidated amounts, and therefore, the decision to deny recovery was affirmed based on the lack of statutory or contractual authority for the claimed damages.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dommages-intérêts contractuels entrepreneur créance en restitution étatique contrat de droit administratif utilisation sans droit de valeurs patrimoniales action en constatation de responsabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                

 

  !" #!!"   !#  # " 

#$%   &  %  



  !"""# $%&' "() )!)*





!*)

++       +    +   "*"# ,*!"(-)!* ./0& $%12   



       

   4%354  

  #""! ) !66!"*"!  & 78") %11'  6) 9  "  !:")#  #""!)"*#)/*!)*!")2!8;)%11<=

)!)$178")%11'=

  )#6!   "  %$ :#8)") %11'  !6!)**  6)!6!"*"! *)*"! > 8!")  8)* 6)  )!)* ? !** ?"*#)/* !)*!")  +@) 01AB1 6!)  6#)"! %111 C "  +@) $55A&0D  *  "*" ? "*#)/* !)*!")  +@) $10 10 6!)  6#)"! %11$  !"*  ! E  +@) $00AB0=

F!))!)* !:")#6)!!))")0)%11'=

 9?" !8"* ?*#)") ?!) "*)8 *)  6)*"  9" * :"  "*"-=

 #  ' ( "  !" #!!"   !#  # " 

& )+   ,

-*+.+%% / )0 12 3 "45

$A ! * >  "   9  ! E > *"*) ?"*#)/* !)*!") 6!)  6#)"!%111*6#)"!%11$*)#"*>$00:)AB0A

%A F,!**9;!"A

5A !*> !!) *!--*>)#-) !A

&A F,!**9;!"A

0A 8"*  >8))!**$00:)AB0>"?""> :"!")%11'6*)A

<A "*96)!#)*-)*"*A

'A 66"*"!F)*A01 ":!)6)*"9F68*:!)) )!)!*)6)#*))/*#"517!)(!*":"*"!6)6" )!#)# )";:##)) +.G"H).!:9"< <11&



32'3%11'  45354     *)!"I6")A#"6*/*)6)!!-#A#!")!"*J D""9)I**9#""!)!)*#")!;*")"*6 #""!9#=;DI6!)6!)9!*":"*"6!8!")) *)#""!=D6!)*)"-*)!!)6)#**A+"#!") !*"* 6  *)!" ##* ##)# ! ) D ;D * D "4   )";:##))6!))6*))*"()))!)9F" 8)#))"))8;A#!"))!)*"!)!)!,  6)8  9" )!* 7!"*  "" 9  #""! 9# * F8!66  9#*#I6#"#)!)*C)*A$5% $1<*$12DA    -)::"()J )#"*J       KL M ;+

!6"!:!)6)#*))/**!*":"#I6)*"*>?::"6)-)::





32'3%11'