Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/202/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/202/2007 Généré par l'IA

Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness and Due Process Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/202/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The litigant sought relief concerning the forfeiture of property related to alleged criminal activity, arguing that the relevant statute was unconstitutionally vague because it failed to provide adequate notice of what conduct would subject property to seizure and that the statute impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to the owner, violating due process. The court held that the statutory scheme was not unconstitutionally vague as the conduct penalized was clearly delineated, and furthermore, the statutory scheme provided for an opportunity for the owner to challenge the seizure, which satisfied due process requirements against an unconstitutional burden shift.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness and Due Process Challenge: The court held that the statutory scheme was not unconstitutionally vague as the conduct penalized was clearly delineated, and furthermore, the statutory scheme provided for an opportunity for the owner to challenge the seizure, which satisfied due process requirements against an unconstitutional burden shift.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
péremption action mobilière fardeau de la preuve condition légale restriction de droit public à la propriété infractions contre la sécurité des rapports juridiques

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
This provision is cited in the final order concerning the awarding of costs in favor of the respondent.
Généré par l'IA
A/2406/2004
Property Forfeiture Statute Vagueness Challenge
A/1820/2002
Statutory Vagueness and Due Process Challenge to Asset Acquisition Charge
A/1391/2001
Statutory Interpretation of Property Forfeiture Criteria
A/1483/2002
Statute Vagueness Challenge and Due Process Compliance
A/2601/2004
Wrongful Attachment Procedural Due Process Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the final order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This provision is cited in the final order concerning the awarding of costs in favor of the respondent.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               !""#$!%&&# '!%&%!%&&$

 '

 ' ( ('(   ( 

)* "

 %+ ,- %&&$ 



 !"#$!%&'()* +

+

  ,,       ,    , ! +#$ +" -./0!   

            

   3&1/3  

( .'

%4  56++6"#+"++" 67+4   ++!  + 88$ 6) "   + 9* " #6+:36);7+$"6""+"$6"+4

&4 "#""<$!8+6*"+"&=#&''/$++ " #6+6+<#>"++"?%"$#>&''?"+ $++  "  8* "   " ?<0'? 84 &'4  #++ "@ 6  $ &''' + &''% $++ 6A> B ?' C! +  6 <$ &''? $++ B $9B<""6"6#+6#4

?4 "$"%%C+&''/!"$B<$6"6#+ $-+  ## " &<%0? 8!4 &' "  ?% "$#> &'''  "5 #+$4 <$ <+ 7++$ "  ") #+$  "+ " % 6+#>&''24

04 "$"26+#>&''2!$#$B<$6#+" ## " 02& 84 0' B ++ "<+$.+ #+ $   $ " ++6"C*&'''B"$#>&'''4

/4 <$8#$66+%=6+#>&''2!"$+6#6" 7>+$.++$+$$4

24  "$ " D *#> &''2!    C+$ <66+!  $8$+ 5 "6+$94

(4 <$ +C++   &( *#> &''2! $9+ 7  +" "  6#+"++<+6"@B#**+$"6+!#B #7"+$+"*"#++8"6+"4

=4 $6"&&C*&''(!6+$"*+ C+"4

D4 ++$+$+$##7$+&/C*&''(+"#B "6+6++4

%'4 ,7!$+$9"$BC94







(  '



1002(1&''2  3?1/3   %4 9*E9+C":;$+$#"8$+++$!") %@+&''?! >+"!#6$"/C9! "+6$"++*36$"+!/66$++%2C9:+4%+4 +/2 ;4

,+BE+"E$+"%2C9!6 >8$"$ &(C*&''0: F%?'%'2;!" 9*"6+$!%?8$*!  "6+++9+6#+++ >+"  " $9   B + C9 ++! ! " E+++ " E$+"*5C94

&4 8#$#+B<+4/24%+4-4%! >+"  G+  + 7 " +++ 6$* B E+4 /2 "   8$"$   6+ 9$$ " "+ "   " 2 +> &''' : ;7++*B8$"$E3*+**+" &'"$#>%D02: ,;4

,#6$+6C9""E6)+$+>4

?4    + +$  *9  % C* &''?! +G+  #"8+ " #> "6+ $9 "  "# "  4 ,  6#+$!6+"*7"+<667"+.++-$B#) "667)966>+*9##+H 8+C"7#+"$+#++6"+: F%?'&?'"4%4%I ??/"4%4&I F%&D0"4%4&I F%&(02("4%!%&2%?2 "40>+$8$;4)9"6$"7+B<667+ $*")C"+$*9: F%%(D?"42>!%%&?2' "40I  %DD=J?(64?%2"4?>;4 E667" "E6)4

04 +C+$"8#+"$6+6!+*>:+4/2 +2' ;4

/4  + ++ "* 6A " +$.+ #+ B < " 6 " 6#+"$6!#+87<8++#6+>4

24 , E+4 &2 4 %  !  $ " ++ $- + # B  66+"E+$.+#+4 66+ 8#$!#+)"E ,!6 E+40%>")9#+"?%+>%D0(<*+**+ : ,;! "+  + 7  6 5K+  +*+$ +* "$6"+ + + " 6A " +$.+ #+   ++ 6B6A>""$#6+7<<+6*$"?' CB#6+"8++6"#6+:+40%>4%+4  ,;4+++$6+$6A$7<6*+B"



1002(1&''2  301/3   #6+I7++5"+$.+#+!<$)*B/L6$:84 +40&4%+& ,;4

7. <6)!8+"++7<+#$$+>"$#6+"++ ""+"%("$#>&''%+7<"8*"&<%0?84&'$++ 6A> "  ++ C4 +8!   " "88+$ 8) +$ 6  +!     "$  6 " 6#+! "@#+ -$6"!+<+7++$"")#+$%6+#> &''24 $7!<+#$$++"+"8+"+$.+#+! #6++"*#+88+$4

<9#+ " +  7  <+ 6 6> " +" "  6#+"++6<+66++4""66B+ $9" 7   C6" " > 8$"$ "  : F ;  "#6+6+$#6#+"E+$.+#+#.# +" "  6#+ " ++ E+ 6 "@ B  8+ " "$>+4  88+! "  "# " ++  +$.+ #+ + " +$.+ #6+!"+$B#6>$$87"$>+$6A+ +"*#+++*6$C">6$4>++" #68+7"$>+>++"+$.+"6#+"88$$! *+9 "+ + 6$$#+ 6*$  $4  +$.+ #+ + " #.#+"E+#6+>B8+""#6+B  8+ " E$ :-88 %''% I   %DD& 64 %(( M F %DD( 64 ?&?;4 "$>+""+$.+#++3"$6"+"#+86 7++E+6$+$6A$B+#64

=4 *"76$)"!<*)#8"$4







NNN













1002(1&''2  3/1/3     '.  ' ( ('(   ( 

 

/01,1** 2  311 1  45 6#%  7

  ,1*

%4 $*>4

 ,1

&4 C++4

?4 +76$"+9++4

04 8#  6+ "  7E 6*+ 8#  +  6$+ .+ "  "$ " ?' C ")  +8+ 6) " > 8$"$ :,-OP-872!2''0  ;!6*"#+)""+ 6>!8#$#+5+4=&"8$"$ >8$"$"%( C &''/ : F;I  #$# "  "+ "7  ! #+8 + #A"6*+6+9+"+"#"+I"+ .+ "$  > 8$"$ 6 * 6+  6 * $+7 5 "+ " <+4 0&  F4  6$+ .+ +  6)  6 " +!*7$###A"6*!"*+.+C+B<*4  988)  6$"+         ,A* Q R         

68#"6$+.+++8$56+7EBE888$"$ "6988





1002(1&''2