Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/19/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/19/2007 Généré par l'IA

Compound vs. Simple Interest on Post-Judgment Awards

Numéro de cause ATAS/19/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The matter concerned the calculation of an interest award following a judgment, specifically the propriety of applying a compound interest rate derived from a prior stipulated agreement to the post-judgment period, where the underlying stipulation governed only pre-judgment interest. The court reasoned that absent an express contractual provision or clear statutory authorization for post-judgment compound interest, the general rule of simple interest should apply to the judgment amount; therefore, applying the contractually derived compound rate post-judgment was improper, requiring recalculation using the statutory simple interest rate.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Compound vs. Simple Interest on Post-Judgment Awards: The court reasoned that absent an express contractual provision or clear statutory authorization for post-judgment compound interest, the general rule of simple interest should apply to the judgment amount; therefore, applying the contractually derived compound rate post-judgment was improper, requiring recalculation using the statutory simple interest rate.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul des intérêts remboursement du prêt interprétation de l'arrêt calcul de l'indemnité réparatrice calcul de la valeur litigieuse paiement du solde au comptant

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.
Généré par l'IA
A/393/2001
Post-Judgment Interest Calculation on Settled Debt
A/1621/2003
Post-Judgment Interest Calculation Dispute
A/1974/2005
Contractual vs. Statutory Interest Accrual Post-Judgment
A/2987/2007
Judgment Interest Calculation Dispute
A/677/2005
Statutory vs. Contractual Post-Judgment Interest Rate Calculation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the procedural costs of the federal court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !!"# $##%   "& $##'



( )(  *  ( *)

+,-  .

 "" /0 $##' 



 !"#$! %  & '

'

(   ) ((  %   !'"*'+ '#$ ,-!   

              

   %-./%  

  1 2    3%45 6 )$7  8$$9$ " 4''")482':;#80::/'0;-11<=

"50>;-11-!)?4@$$3?7'''9; %#"   % "; "4   (   % )@' "  ;'")%#""2$'")"')$9'4'=

!";"$4"'")?!)$)4'4"$#A$B  $' "  '' ") ;  (  !  8 2  99' )'4;B''";"=

!4##"$#B4'-,>'-11,!)$"$ 8 "#''9 3 7  C4'C "@$ '  (     ) ((     3( 7=

)D9';2)'")#48'$"'';)#"" A+"9'2)4$$"##'$'$99$B  (  =

)"#"2( )'B)99B'%#"=

"8;'"-,4'#8-11,!( B);8'$" C4'C9'#22));'""$B)$@"")$! 2  '@  ' ") 2  " '  %#" ' 2   $''#4$''!'@''""#")%#"=

);'$ B  "$'#! )$  9#$  4' 4  " 0<'8-11,=

 4 E' " F ;#8 -11,!    ''$  #4$' ' '#   8"$##8>'"#4$'=

"@"$B>@=

     2   @;  G@' >" 37  $'$ #"9$'''$!"50H'-11<! 8'"! #4$ " I >@! "'  4$"' '  ;%4$"'! I 44$' ' 0, >@ 3'J0'J'I, 7=

'BG'"G$'"0,>@!4 89$"$ -F>;-11/3 *0<101,7!" @;"4'$!0<9$;! "4'''@'4#''' 8'" " $@   B ' >@ ''! ! " G''' " G$' " ;+>@=



.//01.-11,  %<./%    9#$#' B )'J I,  J 0 'J  AJ / !  8 ' " K''2"'''4$; BG'I,   2 ' '; B   9$"$  G%#" " 0L# 0::/ 3 7=

) )! )$ 4A  (  " ); 4 "  "$ )'' B )99 B  ' %#" 2  !  2 $2;' B  4"$">'=

  #4$' " (  ' $#$$ + 'J / ' ;' "   ")44' " -: # 0::F "   9$"$  ) #"  3   = ( <1I7'<';'"5@#'")+$'"  3%456 5@#'=( <1IJ107=

) 2  9' #2  ( !  )#8' 4 B %! $@#'! " "'"$"#M44''4")'$ B'';'#"=

4A9#$4)$B)'"( '""$$"9"#'=

) 44K' 4'N' 2 )$ '  "# 4  4#' "  4# ") #"! ' 2 )'  2 '' )8' B  A' " A@ ")=

) 99'! "4  0 >; -11,! "' ")'$  ;@ " )'J ,/ J /  ! G$  '" "  4#' "  4#  4' 4 A@ "G '' 2G G 4 4D$ '$@#'  4#   4'4' + H'$$2'$E'#''9"4'=

) )45!  44'' " B )$! 4 4; 9 @ "  "' " $'!")2''"4#"B%#"=

)B'$@"!( 44")"''+4';""+4@B )#4D")$"'"0-"$#8-11I=

) D ' ;$ 2 )$ ) 4 4$"$ B  $' "  99' 45 ")   4  9 " )$ -11<! 2) ) 4  4  )44''$ 99' 4  ' ")';'$ ")    <1 > -11/ 4 A@ ")#"!442))"#"$$'"''49" )$-11/=

) $@" + "$' 2 4$5"'!  C4'C " )$ % 2 ''   4 "$ " >' % "' E' "$$ ## ;8J 



.//01.-11,  %/./%  

  2* )3  )(  *  ( *)



451 ,, 6  7     8 9 "%$ *:

0J $4"$">';8J

-J 9#  4' "  2G 4;' 9#  '  4$' E' "  "$ " <1 > "5  '9' 45 " 8 9$"$ 3(AOPA92,!,11/  7!4;"#'5""' 48!9#$#'+'JL-"9$"$ 89$"$"0F > -11I 3 *7=  #$# "  "' "2  ! #'9 ' #D"4;'4'@'"'"#"'="' E' "$  8 9$"$ 4 ; 4'  4 ; $'2 + "' " )'J /-  *J  4$' E' '  45  4 " '!;2$###D"4;!";'E'>'B);J  @995  $"'6              Q( Q



49#"4$'E'''9$+4'2GBG999$"$ "'$4824@99





.//01.-11,