Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/189/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/189/2007 Généré par l'IA

Judgment Enforcement Fee Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/189/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed a matter concerning the enforcement of a judgment or settlement agreement, specifically interpreting whether certain statutory conditions regarding attorney's fees and collection costs had been satisfied to allow for the recovery sought by the prevailing party. The court reasoned that the relevant statute or agreement dictated clear prerequisites for the recovery of certain expenses, and since the record demonstrated that the required procedural steps or factual basis for those specific recoveries were not adequately established or proven by the party seeking them, the request for those particular items must be denied, affirming the base award but disallowing the ancillary costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Judgment Enforcement Fee Dispute: The court reasoned that the relevant statute or agreement dictated clear prerequisites for the recovery of certain expenses, and since the record demonstrated that the required procedural steps or factual basis for those specific recoveries were not adequately established or proven by the party seeking them, the request for those particular items must be denied, affirming the base award but disallowing the ancillary costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
frais d'exécution règlement du litige perception d'émoluments recouvrement des frais dépens de mandataire professionnel jugement civil

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposed the costs of the federal procedure on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               %&'()%())* !%+,-%()).

!

 !  "!  " " 

"/0  ( $ (. 12 ()). 



 !"""# $%$&  '  (  *!*+ !)*+,#+"!!""-#+.+*/    '"



!+*

00     - 11    * "+"# 2!34 )!+5%6 $%$$   $&





           !"  #$

   '%7&'  

!!  3 !

)*#""!$&!,:*%889 -00     - 11  '   ;"')*<= >*#"+*+-",""+# ;"')*<=*!*+>?

  ! *!*  %$ !,:* %889   *!*+ !++  *#++  -@)2A"+*"BCC+#?

D#"#+#C"@#E- 4C#,*"*%884)!**#)!*+#)!*!!"*?

 )* )"  6 C#,*"* %884  -   "C!*#  *": ,!"* *!"#*#  #""!F!*G +"+ )*<@+++"CB"+"*+ +"<*F+"C""+H

" !   !

D@ +*  D*+H 6&   !" C##* *  )*+" I##*  *!"+  *!"; > D*)+*!"#**#""!!#""!* !))!"+"!FBDED,!"!)*#," *":?

++D)<?

D,D+"!#""! *!*,"+!:F+?

D"!,"+*2**J?

*!*+!:++I"*!"+E#)C"@#-)<E688C*H





756%87%889  '&7&'  

 " 5! 3  !  "!  " " 

$

67100 8   9     :; +*( #<

$H *+#""!*)*D"+"#6C#,*"*%884H

%H !++B*!*+,!:F+H

&H 2*JH

5H !-CC" +!-*",""+#)"+-""+# 688C*H

6H "+B-"+*!#E-#!+H

9H C!*)*+"BD),+C!***!*!+*)*#+G+  #"  &8 F!* <  !+"C"+"! )*<  *": C##* ;1AK"L*A!CB"9 9885  > )*,!"*!*+"<**!"+ ):" !C!*#+@*+HM%!"C##** *":C##*$4 F" %886 ; 0>?  #!"*  *!* !"+ ""B*  !"!  !+"C + !2)*,+)!*+*"I+**!*+!!+"*?"!"+ G+* *#  *": C##* )* ,!" )!+ ! )* ,!" #+*!"B @ !"+"!-*+H5% 0H)*#+G++)"<)!"!*!*+  ",!B#!!2)*, !",+G+*F!"+E-,!"H

  I*CC"<*=  )*#"+=         (N O :1 !)"!C!*)*#+G++!+"C"#@)*+")*I*CC



 



756%87%889