Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/175/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/175/2007 Généré par l'IA

Contractual Notice by Electronic Means and Course of Performance

Numéro de cause ATAS/175/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A dispute arose concerning the application of a statutory requirement for written notice of breach to a contract that incorporated prior agreements and modifications, where the notice was sent by an electronic method not explicitly authorized but used by the parties in previous dealings. The court reasoned that the contract's broad definition of "written notice" and the established course of performance between the parties, evidenced by prior electronic communications, demonstrated a mutual intent to accept the electronic transmission as sufficient written notice, thus satisfying the contractual condition despite the lack of explicit authorization for that specific method in the contract text.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Contractual Notice by Electronic Means and Course of Performance: The court reasoned that the contract's broad definition of "written notice" and the established course of performance between the parties, evidenced by prior electronic communications, demonstrated a mutual intent to accept the electronic transmission as sufficient written notice, thus satisfying the contractual condition despite the lack of explicit authorization for that specific method in the contract text.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
partie au contrat condition légale contrat numérique notification des ententes notification électronique responsabilité contractuelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Applied to order the losing party to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
Applied to regulate the allocation of costs for the second instance.
Généré par l'IA
A/2901/2007
Contractual Notice and Procedural Prerequisites Barring Breach Claim
A/4339/2005
Contract Termination Notice Method Dispute
A/2398/2006
Contractual Notice Requirements and Termination Validity
A/1186/2004
Substance Over Form in Contractual Notice Requirement
A/4331/2005
Contractual Notice Provisions and Strict Compliance

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Applied to order the losing party to pay the costs of the federal judicial proceedings.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

Applied to regulate the allocation of costs for the second instance.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"#$$%  !&'#$$&



( )(* * +*  (* +)

,-.   ## /0  #$$& 



 !"###$! %  &  ' ("()  

")(

  ''       '    ' ! #)#$ #(") *+,-!.")!   





              

   &3/-&  

  $##"  10 6#) 3445   # )" 78"#  ".)#"

9  :;#<)"))")#)#".(".(  =0>441;(?34."(>$344,!

>".."#)#";"($3@6#)3445.(>($!

$##"(".."#)#"2"8A(3445  ";#()$##" )<)#"106#)3445!

("(#)(6)$)15"8A(3445.(>($.(B)(#A $! C "#) = " <.)#"  ")#)#" ."( >$ 344,! D   3445())($(8$D!

($."  E68#(344@.(".")>($##"()#8 =>$344,!

"((#(("()3368#(344@C##C()#((" ("(C#"(>$344,##)#("()>$3445!

"#$()  ("#) C  "# 78"#  33 "8A( 1E-1 ( F"(7#)#" 6###(9:$)$"#;#$)#)#)$!B1("G)3440! (#A)" ("#?"."$#C67!").($#))8#&.($#)! #C..$))#H67(9()?1)?(),5 :!

!#)=F)#"F$)#"67(.( (#A;$$(9 I: 3@68#(344-9 I104145:!( "#78"#".)$!10;$8(#(!  #."#)#" )(#)"#( (7) 9()? 153 : .()))  '  #$7(  (! = )("# 67 )#)#(!  F)))  F$)#"  "8< 67 (!

! ";"($) = >()? ,5  ? 1 )?  *? 1 !  (#A )"  ("#"J)#)#C")))#".($8=F()?,5 "# ;$$( (  .()# 7$$(  ( "#  5 ")"A( 3444 9 :! ()#8="#;$$(34$A(1E-5(F(&8##)(8#8) 9 ':!

".$)."(67(F.B)"$)A#K

>#"8#)>)$(#(.("."#)#">#)#$>($##""() >$344,!



/-012/3445  &0/-&   ! >7#)>$3445!;"( )"))(C")#)#">") "( ;#) >"A6) > $##"   #  ".)#" ) C  ("( ) " .($)($(."#)!

># ( "##A = >($  ;"(( ".."#)#"  ). )# =  $##" C ((  #  ".)#" "() >$ 3445 #   # " . )#;)#"#C>>$))!"("("#)+)($($#((8A?



/-012/3445  &-/-&  

  + )1  )(* * +*  (* +)



234/4 -- 5  644  4   7 8 !%# +9

  /4 -

1? $(("((8A))C>#."()(")#)#">$344,?

3? $(#((8A))C>#."()(")#)#">$3445?

 /4

0? )("(("L#)(8A?

-? $##"(.( #)"78"#".)#" )106#))2"8A(3445?

,? #)C.("$()7()#)?

5? ;"(.()#CF.8);"((("(")(.($)((+)  $#  04 6"( B  ")#;#)#" .(B  (#A ;$$( 9'*M#H(*";C#5!544-  :!.(8"#("()#B(("#) .A#!";"($)<()?23"#;$$(( (#A;$$(1@ 6# 344, 9 I:K  $"#(  ("( "#) ##C(  "#"! ")#; ) "N.(8)."()(#7)(("()"")#(K#"#) +)( ($  (#A ;$$( .( 8"# .") " .( 8"# $)("#C < "#)#">()?-3 I?.($)((+)).#B."#"("()! #8"C$""N.(8!"#8)+)(6"#)=>8"#?  7(;;#B(O  .($#)O         #II (#'  

".#";"(.($)((+))")#;#$<.()#.(7(;;



/-012/3445