Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/147/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/147/2007 Généré par l'IA

Assignment for Benefit of Creditors vs. Unrecorded Security Interest Priority

Numéro de cause ATAS/147/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed whether certain instruments filed pursuant to a statute governing assignments for the benefit of creditors created a lien superior to a prior unrecorded security interest in the debtor's personal property. The court reasoned that the relevant statute did not expressly or implicitly grant an assignment for the benefit of creditors the status of a bona fide purchaser or a lien creditor with priority over previously created, though unrecorded, security interests, distinguishing the situation from cases involving bankruptcy or judicial liens where superior rights are established by statute or case law concerning subsequently acquired rights.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Assignment for Benefit of Creditors vs. Unrecorded Security Interest Priority: The court reasoned that the relevant statute did not expressly or implicitly grant an assignment for the benefit of creditors the status of a bona fide purchaser or a lien creditor with priority over previously created, though unrecorded, security interests, distinguishing the situation from cases involving bankruptcy or judicial liens where superior rights are established by statute or case law concerning subsequently acquired rights.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
privilège dans la faillite biens meubles cession de créance aux fins de sûreté droit judiciaire cession des droits de la masse droit acquis

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court cited this article in the dispositive concerning the allocation of procedural costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



               $%&'($)'  $(%&$)&

!!

 !    !  

+,  - # . /0  )& 



  ! "#$ %&& !   ! #%' ( ' $'""#)$'""*'+%% 



'

,,     - - -  -!'" +. '#$ /0!%'123/!   

              ! "#

   86408  

''"9':*'+%% !'"  " " ; ''$ " < =' 6770!    5< "$#; 6771  ; ' "   ">  % "$ " =' ' >99'"%?@$A8%B  CD

>$@$("#"$E)  !"'"57F'6771!")(" #"%%D

)  ":$ (! E '' ! ##:$ E )    @#' " ;')$''"%%''#%' ;''$27=6771D

 #@$ %  '$$%+:! )      % 9' %(  9#""#""%'':)$#'D

>   E  :  ; " E >   G")'  " " ' (''''$$'$%;'E$%" "$%%%$GD

!%"27=(6773!)  9#$ ;"$:)(' "$'E"#"" "'!"'"5H=(6773! 9#""#""%''$#$D

)E:%"$"=''"B"$$(;D

"$'"':>('">'&/1&6"9$"$"1';6777   %' @$$ " "' "   A C!   %' .' 9#$:>!#@$"#"">'$$!"%""$ ""$%%'D

 ;'"!''':!'##'   ''' '( E   9$"$   %'' #%$#' E > ( ((' ' ("'$ " 5< # 5<1/ A'& /1  & 5 '&  +99 2 C'E>'&02"'"6/';5<1H%'' ' #%$#' E > ( ' ((' ' E > ("'$A'&/1&6'&CD

  9' :> > >   ' 9#' "$ E     9# " "#" " %'' E #%  @9 % % '' :  %"$"=''"(;='%:!9'!)  ' %@$")''""#)%#$8E'#D

!#%''"9':)9%":#E)  %#% %#B $'% " '' '' 8 : '' #%#' E " E )'$$  9# " + 8!   "    " (  " "  %%''$"""$;%%*'$@'#D



4031546771  82408   >='9"B")="E)  "#E;)''"" "#"$D



4031546771  80408  

!  1 2  !    !  

#

34/ ,, 5  6     7 8 (') "9

  / ,I

5& $(;&

# /I

6& "#'%"$"='&

2& ='E)99'"%?@$")'"" ' '"""$'"# "$&

0& 9#  %' "  :> %(' 9#  '  %$' .' "  "$ " 27 = "B  '9' %B " ; 9$"$ A-+JK+9:1!1770  C!%("#'B""' %;!9#$#'L'&H6"9$"$ ;9$"$"53 = 677/ A ,CD  #$# "  "' ":  ! #'9 ' #M"%('%'@'"'"#"'D"' .' "$  ; 9$"$ % ( %'  % ( $': L "' " )'& 06  ,&  %$' .' '  %B  % " '!(:$###M"%(!"('.'='E)(&  @99B  %$"'         N- N N- N



%9#"%$'.'''9$L%':>E>999$"$ "%@99





4031546771