Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/141/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/141/2007 Généré par l'IA

Prejudgment Interest Calculation Period Dispute

Numéro de cause ATAS/141/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party challenged the trial court's refusal to include certain dates in the relevant period for calculating prejudgment interest, arguing the court erred by excluding evidence that supported their claim for damages arising from the opposing party's breach of contract. The court affirmed the trial court's ruling, reasoning that the evidence presented did not establish that the claimed damages accrued on the excluded dates, and thus, the trial court was within its discretion in limiting the interest accrual period to the established date of the breach, as there was no error in the calculation or the underlying factual findings regarding when the damages became certain.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Prejudgment Interest Calculation Period Dispute: The court affirmed the trial court's ruling, reasoning that the evidence presented did not establish that the claimed damages accrued on the excluded dates, and thus, the trial court was within its discretion in limiting the interest accrual period to the established date of the breach, as there was no error in the calculation or the underlying factual findings regarding when the damages became certain.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul des intérêts erreur de calcul déduction en fonction de la durée de la possession valeur litigieuse partie au contrat calcul de la saisie de salaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



                !"!! #$$"  %!% #$$&

''

 '( ((  '( 

)* !

 %! +, #$$& 



 !"###$%&!"'()& ("() $)#""##*$)+)(   ,(#

")(

--     *     !( #)#$ ,"./!%&

          

   53065  

))7*88#)"*(5#&##)$9#5'(% :!'($##" / "&;( 3442!  (8$ )") '())#"  *(5#&##)$ <   =

*#)$($!('($)$'( ,(#  !#)(>)$("(?$;( 3442 ") '(##') < *")("# * () )#%( *#&##)$ %  3/ "&;( 3446! ;###() <  "'()#" '("  '()#! *"&()( *7@))*#)#"#88$()$#=

*$)$#;$$8#*#)>(##7&88)A$;(3442! '($##"&#5'($#) (#;'(#%(#)?$;(3442=

'($##"6B>&#(344/!"#7$ (#;$@>"(! * $$##"/"&;(3442)'(""$(&"#'"( "'$)*#)()#"$#"8"(*C'()#'(###'##(=

"#$()7"8"($)<*()DA6D6 !*((')!>7*<*&"# "'($&#<*)"(#)$("(!("#$(($##"")(7("( $)$8"($=

"&$##""#)@)(")#8#$("())"#7$<*)"(#)$ ("(=

*)8##)#E7("F"(('"C"#" *($=

))*'%=

  ("()! ('($)$ '(  &")!  ("#) <  ##)$ < )#)(  '()##')#"<8(#)$'!8#C$*'%<B*4448(D9()D?.GD6 =()D 2B)DE :=

HHH





0121103442  56065  

'  -.  '( ((  '( 

 

/01+1** 2  311 1  45 %"#  6

BD ()$##"* 6B>&#(344/D

3D $(("(";>)D

6D " *#)#$ < ',( <  ("()  "  B*444 8(D < )#)(  '()##')#"<8(#)$'D

1D "<'(&"#(*$")D  E(88#%(  '($#)         ,&# G I #  



"'#"8"('($)((@))")#8#$C'()###7J<J88#8$$( ("#'(E(88





0121103442