Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1203/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1203/2007 Généré par l'IA

Enforceability of Expired Contractual Assignment Restriction

Numéro de cause ATAS/1203/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The dispute concerned whether a contractual provision regarding assignment of rights was enforceable given that the provision's term had expired prior to the assignment in question. The court held that the provision had indeed expired, finding that the language specifying the duration of the assignment restriction was controlling, and therefore, the assignment made after the expiration of the relevant term was valid and not barred by the terminated contractual restriction.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Enforceability of Expired Contractual Assignment Restriction: The court held that the provision had indeed expired, finding that the language specifying the duration of the assignment restriction was controlling, and therefore, the assignment made after the expiration of the relevant term was valid and not barred by the terminated contractual restriction.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cession de contrat expiration du bail réalisation des conditions matérielles titre exécutoire interdiction de la cession validité du contrat déterminé

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article was cited in the dispositive order regarding the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
A/1979/2005
Contractual Assignment Restriction Dispute
A/787/2004
Contractual Assignment Validity and Statutory Compliance
A/1746/2005
Contractual Assignment Validity and Notice Dispute
A/4359/2007
Contractual Assignment Validity Without Consent
A/2811/2006
Contractual Assignment of Future Work Upon Termination vs. Public Policy Against Restraint of Trade

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article was cited in the dispositive order regarding the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           #$%&&#'(() *#%'(+#'((,

*

 *  !*  ! ! 

!-./ $  +% / '((, 



  !"#$%& !'( ( )"(  !*"(  +( ,

(

,,,,  * ,, , (!"  -./ !'()"(  ! *"(  +( 01''

           !"   

   5$2.5  

  "  ''(  #% 6( $%%4   '    7!( " $4!$%%4 " (   85'9(: #%;'"---) *(.<=$ >

(6(" ( #.)!?$%%4' >

  "'     $$ "!? $%%4  "'@ "'" '  (#7")$%%<( '@  4!$%%<>

 A   !'( '  '(  $ ! $%%< B *  @ ? "")"@C(>

  .%D($%%<'@7! ?  "@ ''(('(>

(( @* ( $3(?$%%<'(( "'"  *  E (! @   (  " (  ( ((   "'!'">



2&#332$%%4  5.2.5  

 ! 0* 1  *  !*  ! ! 

  2   3

45.. 6 27 8) 9  :

#= (B  @* " $&!$%%4  (@ "''( #%6($%%4 )( @=

$= (B  @*(=

.= F !((@ ?=

&= !' "'=

/= (@'" (-((=

4= 7!  '(   @A ')( 7!  (  '"( C(   "  .% 6 9  (7( '9  ? 7" " 8,1GH17@44%%&  :') !(9  ( '?7!"!(E(=I$ 7" " ?7" " #< 6 $%%/ 8 J:>  !"!   (  @   !(7 ( !F ')('(-( ( ! (> ( C(  "  ? 7" " ' ) '(  ' ) "(@ E  (  *(= &$  J=  '"( C( (  '9  '  ()@"!!!F ') )(C(6(B*)=    -779K " (K       ,F) 0 L  

'7! '"(C(((7"E'(@ABA777" " ("'?@'-77



2&#332$%%4