Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1172/2007 • CJ GE ATAS/1172/2007 Généré par l'IA

Property Tax Assessment Statute Validity Challenge

Numéro de cause ATAS/1172/2007
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved a dispute over the validity of several statutory sections pertaining to the assessment and taxation of property, with the challenger asserting that these sections violated constitutional requirements for uniformity and proper legislative procedure because the enactments contained amendments not clearly indicated in their titles or by reference, as required by the state constitution. The court upheld the challenged sections, reasoning that the title of the enacting legislation sufficiently provided notice of the subject matter being addressed, thereby satisfying the constitutional requirements related to the title's content, and further found that the referenced amendments, though perhaps not perfectly highlighted, were sufficiently germane to the overall subject to be deemed valid under the relevant procedural mandates.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF; Property Tax Assessment Statute Validity Challenge: The court upheld the challenged sections, reasoning that the title of the enacting legislation sufficiently provided notice of the subject matter being addressed, thereby satisfying the constitutional requirements related to the title's content, and further found that the referenced amendments, though perhaps not perfectly highlighted, were sufficiently germane to the overall subject to be deemed valid under the relevant procedural mandates.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la taxation fiscale modification législative impôt foncier biens étatiques objet du litige exigence constitutionnelle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This article regulates the decision on costs, which is explicitly imposed in order 1.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
This article regulates the award of costs, which is explicitly imposed in order 1.
Généré par l'IA
A/1480/2006
Property Tax Assessment Validity and Constitutional Challenge
A/3246/2006
Tax Assessment Challenge Regarding Statutory Constitutionality
A/1180/2007
Property Tax Assessment and Lien Validity Challenge
A/4647/2006
Property Assessment Validity Under New Valuation Statute
A/1362/2006
Tax Assessment Validity and Valuation Methodology Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article regulates the decision on costs, which is explicitly imposed in order 1.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

This article regulates the award of costs, which is explicitly imposed in order 1.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



             

! !"

# $%# "!  #" !"$

"&'(  )  * (          !" ) #$%& ' (   )      + ,,     )!"  -.%/)&01#0## #2   )   ,  ,,  ,,,+ ,,   //" ,+  ,*3!)))#4550     

    

   706&7  

 +$

#8   "  #.42 9:)  /; +!/-"  !!")"<)! + ) )1;"<#.$$=) >;;) +;)79) )?)3!"@3/)"8 ,   ")" /  3@ /  ,  ,,   ,,,   ,+  ,A7/B, C8

08  "/"00/)!D0552 ! /B +     + ,, 7    A7/B  C <) =  /  3@ +))/;) +!) </;8

28  &!055&, ))">+!") )  + ) )) )3">!) /D ! +")) @B <!DD >+ D))/ )/)" )<" 8 ;  /!)) +)/ ///!-< +7< )"  "!3/)</) )< /)",  "   !)" EB E>+ 2# E) 055& "   D + /)" )< #55F8

&8  #0)D055&,  "=+" )=) +< )" 0%F) !)"/)))=+)"@)" 1F8

18 9! " /))")" )#5)D0551/+;;)    A7/B  C8   ")" ))" > +" /<) ; < /)" )<  )<)"!)))/=)D)!!D /" @3 3G  @38     ")" //"  ;!)  9 !) !! @)  )! , @" = +   )! '7!)<=,8

48  "  #% ;"< 0554 +   ;!" +" >+ <) ) =   !)" EB +)))  0 H) 0551  2# ! 0554 ) = > <) "D)  ! = < /"D  !/)D)" !  ) @ <;!) +!/-" !! +"!))=@)!/8

%8  "  . ! 0554 ) ) !/:)   #% ;"< 0554 +  /B < "9!"    ))" > +" <) )3"   !)"EB +7 )E>+2#E)055&) B  )= !)"EB  +))) #H)055&2# !05548

$8  4E0554+";!"//)8)) "D)  ) 9  !)" EB )  # H) 055&  ") > I < <G /  "  )!/ " )  02 < 055&  ,  ) /  



6.206055%  726&7   /!)   !)" ) E+ /:  <J)I8  ) =  >  "D)   !)" +))) !!  02 < 055& = 3@ /    !/) +")D "!/)> <)?)!=, ;> !)) "E=/:)!/"8

+" B< /  >+ //  ) = + !)" EB /  /) >)!/B "/J)  ! 8 " )> + !)" EB +))) )  ")" H ?) <" B  00 E< 055&>)!/B "/J)  8

.8  " 00E<055%+ E)"+//)8

#58 +")E)"4!055%) ) "//)8 / @!) "E= "<//" //)8



 !$

#8 ;!"!)=K)814 K@)E AC D ) )!/"))/)) /")8

08 ) +)8%# /"  !))< #0/)!D#.$1 A C +))" /) +;;   >?)   +//    ) )  )) E > ) /)D +?) ;;)" / +  /" 8     >B)  ) ) D@)  /) )  "  <)//D8

28  +/B  )) E >   ,  ,,   ,,, + ,,   ,+  ,/)?)"/+  /")/" 8

E);/">) +//8



6.206055%  7&6&7  



 " ,!$+  $%# "!  #" !"$

) - -   '

#8 //,  ,,  ,,,+ ,,   ,+  ,8

08 !/)) ".  /'(  / ")!8      @;;B  " )     7 L M  

/;! /") ));"9/)/@;;



6.206055%