Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ATAS/1060/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/1060/2008 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure

Numéro de cause ATAS/1060/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned a decision related to a municipal administrative procedure where the appellant challenged the rejection of their request for authorization, arguing that the authority had failed to provide a timely decision as required by law. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Regarding Implied Rejection in Municipal Administrative Procedure: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that since the administrative authority had not formally issued a decision within the statutory period, the resulting administrative silence amounted to a rejection, and the appeal challenging the silence was therefore properly directed against that implied rejection.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
autorités communales annulation de la décision administrative griefs de procédure décision préjudicielle attaquable recours du personnel subrogation de la collectivité publique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.
Généré par l'IA
C/12605/2018
Administrative Silence and Mootness of Appeal Period
A/3962/2013
Appeal Against Administrative Law Decision Upheld
A/243/2017
Appealability of Incidental Administrative Order Compelling Permit Application
A/984/2024
Applicant's Appeal of Administrative Clarification of Prior Court Order Dismissed
A/2563/2009
Applicants' Request for Interpretation of Administrative Ruling Rejected

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 al. 1 let. a LTF

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because the decision constituted an appealable final decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Provision cited for the allocation of court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

A/560/2008

### [ATAS/1060/2008](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1962024) du 25.09.2008 ( PC ) , ADMIS

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2008/0010/ATAS_001060_2008_A_560_2008.pdf)

* /