Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ATAS/104/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/104/2008 Généré par l'IA

Issue Preclusion in Benefit Entitlement Based on Prior Administrative Finding of Missed Condition Precedent

Numéro de cause ATAS/104/2008
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned whether a prior administrative determination regarding a party's entitlement to benefits was binding on a subsequent court action concerning the same entitlement, where the prior determination was based on a finding that the party failed to meet a time-sensitive condition precedent. The court reasoned that the prior administrative finding, having been rendered by an agency with jurisdiction and involving the same essential facts and issue of timeliness as the present litigation, represented a final decision on a jurisdictional prerequisite and thus precluded relitigation under principles of issue preclusion, affirming the lower court's dismissal of the subsequent claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Issue Preclusion in Benefit Entitlement Based on Prior Administrative Finding of Missed Condition Precedent: The court reasoned that the prior administrative finding, having been rendered by an agency with jurisdiction and involving the same essential facts and issue of timeliness as the present litigation, represented a final decision on a jurisdictional prerequisite and thus precluded relitigation under principles of issue preclusion, affirming the lower court's dismissal of the subsequent claim.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance licenciement administratif fixation de compétence applicabilité du droit de préemption forclusion pour tardiveté effets des arrêts préjudiciels

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 93 LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal because it challenges a preliminary decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the costs of the federal appeal proceedings on the appellant.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet



           &'()*&+))( ,&-)'&+)).

,

 ,/ ,     /

01"  - % +* 2 +)).            !"#"$$$$$$$$$%&' ""  (  )     "    )) # )       &' # # ) # *#  +,,, -./0* "%12! 132,1,, ,1

       !   "  ! #  $% % 

   *148*  

%  3 4%!""""%15-&9"1665%"' "9%'     !"#"$$$$$$$$$  ':""""; ,"-&9"1665"  "<== '!"9"%"'- ">  9"1665 - ""!!"  +,,?,5:@

 A '"'  B  C  """ ! %A %' "% !"  ))  # )         #   # )   # *#  +,,,D*!"0E11 9"1665"'&  !& %  !" " )* % "9 %A =&  %A"*& " 'F%   % '"G &" "H" =I

A- 'C%' "&"="&' "9%'FAA- "% %'"!! @

86-&9"1665 "9%'&!" %',5%'&9"1665 C A '"' = FA %F  & = !" F   %  """  "  %'%@

AA !&= '@

     4% ="&'&  C A" . >3  . ,  .  J. 1 %   /- " A"/  B%" DE  "9   % "  K     F %     !"'- C L" . >3 %   ='%'" "  !"  /''" % %"  % "  % 3  9" 1666 D EF " -C='%'""L"*- "-- %16 %'&9",723D )E@

&!' !"B/"%%L!0 ' 9@

A" 36 !"'FI , ""% G "%'!'% " B"-  = %%' B C"". " .8?C2, !!9!"/. D =.'/&  ""%A )"  (1615E@

=" %  "FA!"%%%'"!! @

A""" %0"!"'& "'@

"""%15-&9"1665- !! - % "& "C &&9B %&!' @





4256741665  *848*     5,/6  ,/ ,     /

%

  3 1

,. '"""""-9.

1. "& """%A '"'C&&9B %&!' .

8.  F!"'%" /"  .

2. ="&  !"  %  FL !-  ="&" ""  "  !"'  ""G  %  %' % 86 B" %0   =  !"0 % "9 ='%'" D)JMN"J=F33662  E!"-%""& 0"%%"  !9="&'& (" .?1%='%'"" "9='%'"%,5 B 166> D E@  &'&" % "" %  %F"   & =   &H%!"- !" "/ "%"" %&% "@%  G " %"'  "9 ='%'" !" - !   !" - ' "F ( %  % A" . 21  .  !"'  ""G     !0  ! % "" -F'&&&H%!"-%- G "B CA-.   /"==0"  "'%      #"* O "P 

!="&%!"' ""G   ='(!" FLCL==='%'" %"!"/"==



4256741665