Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
ACPR/145/2012 • CJ GE ACPR/145/2012 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Provisional Release in Drug Trafficking Case

Numéro de cause ACPR/145/2012
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court was presented with an appeal concerning the refusal to grant provisional release to an individual detained pending trial for involvement in drug trafficking, where the lower court cited risks of flight and collusion as justification under Article 221 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The reviewing court upheld the detention, reasoning that the severity and nature of the alleged offense, drug trafficking, inherently supported the initial assessment that the grounds for continued detention, specifically the risk of flight and the potential to tamper with evidence or influence co-conspirators, remained sufficiently established to justify denying provisional release.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

CPP. 221; Appeal Regarding Denial of Provisional Release in Drug Trafficking Case: The reviewing court upheld the detention, reasoning that the severity and nature of the alleged offense, drug trafficking, inherently supported the initial assessment that the grounds for continued detention, specifically the risk of flight and the potential to tamper with evidence or influence co-conspirators, remained sufficiently established to justify denying provisional release.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
commerce de stupéfiants mise en liberté risque de fuite infraction risque de collusion maintien en détention provisoire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
CPP. 221
This provision is cited in the dispositive section regarding the decision on the appeal concerning provisional detention.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
CPP. 221

This provision is cited in the dispositive section regarding the decision on the appeal concerning provisional detention.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

P/3933/2012

### [ACPR/145/2012](/apps/decis/fr/pcpr/show/1661499) (3) du 11.04.2012 ( MP ) , REFUS

Descripteurs :

; DÉTENTION PROVISOIRE ; COMMERCE DE STUPÉFIANTS ; SOUPÇON ; RISQUE DE FUITE ; RISQUE DE COLLUSION

Normes :

CPP. 221

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/pcpr/file/2012/0001/ACPR_000145_2012_P_3933_2012.pdf)