Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/829/2020 • CJ GE ACJC/829/2020 Généré par l'IA

LLC Bankruptcy Declaration Annulled Upon Debt Payment

Numéro de cause ACJC/829/2020
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed an appeal against a lower court's decision declaring a limited liability company bankrupt, noting that the appellant filed the appeal within the prescribed time limits and subsequently paid the debt, interest, and costs. The court reasoned that the payment of the debt satisfied the legal grounds for retracting the bankruptcy order under the relevant enforcement law, leading the court to annul the bankruptcy declaration while upholding the remainder of the lower court's judgment, though the appellant was assessed costs for the appeal, which were covered by their initial advance payment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC, Art. 72 ss LTF; LLC Bankruptcy Declaration Annulled Upon Debt Payment: The court reasoned that the payment of the debt satisfied the legal grounds for retracting the bankruptcy order under the relevant enforcement law, leading the court to annul the bankruptcy declaration while upholding the remainder of the lower court's judgment, though the appellant was assessed costs for the appeal, which were covered by their initial advance payment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
société à responsabilité limitée paiement de la dette annulation du jugement de faillite mise à la charge des frais concordat dans la faillite avance de frais

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article is cited in the legal considerations section before the dispositive, but since the dispositive only confirms or annuls the previous judgment, and does not explicitly cite this article in the final orders, it is technically excluded based on the strict rule requiring citation *in* the dispositive. However, as this case concerns bankruptcy (faillite), Art. 174 LP (the law governing bankruptcy, specifically payment leading to revocation) is the substantive ground that justified the annulment (chiffre 1), even if the dispositive itself refers back to the annulment order.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
This procedural provision is mentioned in the indication of the means of recourse, not in the binding final orders of the Cour de justice civile.
Art. 319 ss CPC
This is cited in the legal considerations preceding the dispositive, relating to the appeal procedure, but is not explicitly repeated in the final orders.
Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This is cited in the legal considerations preceding the dispositive, relating to the appeal procedure, but is not explicitly repeated in the final orders.
art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
This procedural provision was cited for the admissibility/timing of the appeal but does not appear in the dispositive orders themselves.
Art. 72 ss LTF
This procedural provision is mentioned in the indication of the means of recourse, not in the binding final orders of the Cour de justice civile.
Généré par l'IA
C/71/2024
LLC Bankruptcy Annulled Upon Debt Payment
C/15574/2020
LLC Bankruptcy Annulled Upon Debt Payment
C/16085/2025
LLC Bankruptcy Annulled Upon Debt Payment on Appeal
C/16569/2023
LLC Bankruptcy Annulled After Debt Payment
C/5331/2022
LLC Bankruptcy Annulled Due to Subsequent Debt Repayment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP

This article is cited in the legal considerations section before the dispositive, but since the dispositive only confirms or annuls the previous judgment, and does not explicitly cite this article in the final orders, it is technically excluded based on the strict rule requiring citation *in* the dispositive. However, as this case concerns bankruptcy (faillite), Art. 174 LP (the law governing bankruptcy, specifically payment leading to revocation) is the substantive ground that justified the annulment (chiffre 1), even if the dispositive itself refers back to the annulment order.

Art. 319 ss CPC

This is cited in the legal considerations preceding the dispositive, relating to the appeal procedure, but is not explicitly repeated in the final orders.

Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This is cited in the legal considerations preceding the dispositive, relating to the appeal procedure, but is not explicitly repeated in the final orders.

art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

This procedural provision was cited for the admissibility/timing of the appeal but does not appear in the dispositive orders themselves.

Art. 100 al. 1 LTF

This procedural provision is mentioned in the indication of the means of recourse, not in the binding final orders of the Cour de justice civile.

Art. 72 ss LTF

This procedural provision is mentioned in the indication of the means of recourse, not in the binding final orders of the Cour de justice civile.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/3688/2020

### [ACJC/829/2020](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/2413132) du 16.06.2020 sur JTPI/6191/2020 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2020/0008/ACJC_000829_2020_C_3688_2020.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourante : · Intimée :

A______ SARL ______ ______ · B______ [caisse de prévoyance LPP] ______ ______

C/3688/2020 ACJC/829/2020

DU MARDI 16 JUIN 2020

Vu le jugement JTPI/6191/2020 du 26 mai 2020 prononçant la faillite de A______ SÀRL (ch. 1 du jugement) ;

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 15 juin 2020 par A______ SÀRL, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC ;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris ;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours ;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/6191/2020 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 26 mai 2020 dans la cause C/3688/2020-5 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur

Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Mélanie DE RESENDE PEREIRA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF;

RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*