Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/367/2021 • CJ GE ACJC/367/2021 Généré par l'IA

Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Subsequent Debt Payment

Numéro de cause ACJC/367/2021
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed an appeal against a first-instance judgment that declared a company bankrupt based on an outstanding debt. The court ultimately annulled the bankruptcy order, citing the subsequent payment of the debt, interest, and costs by the appellant. However, the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal, which were offset by the advance payment made, and the court explicitly warned the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be revoked without proof of solvency submitted with the appeal, pursuant to relevant enforcement and civil procedure laws.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, art. 319 ss CPC, art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC, art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Subsequent Debt Payment: The court ultimately annulled the bankruptcy order, citing the subsequent payment of the debt, interest, and costs by the appellant. However, the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal, which were offset by the advance payment made, and the court explicitly warned the appellant that any future bankruptcy declaration would not be revoked without proof of solvency submitted with the appeal, pursuant to relevant enforcement and civil procedure laws.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement de la dette faillite civile annulation civile avance de frais article du CPC preuve de solvabilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This article concerning bankruptcy proceedings was cited in the legal grounds considered by the court.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*
art. 319 ss CPC
This article, cited under 'Vu en droit', likely forms the basis for the decision on the appeal, although the specific ground for annulment is primarily derived from the payment of the debt which overrides the need for bankruptcy.
art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This procedural article regarding the grounds for appeal was cited, although the primary order is based on the payment of the debt.
art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
The appeal was deemed admissible as it was filed in the time and form prescribed by these procedural rules.
art. 66 al. 1 LTF
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the appeal according to this provision (implied by the cost order, even if the article is mentioned in the appeal instructions section, costs are applied based on standard practice related to the procedure mentioned, but since cost order is explicit, this reference is commonly used for imposing costs). Note: The dispositive orders the costs according to cantonal law practice, but the appeal instructions reference LTF articles, thus referencing the cost imposition implicitly linked to the procedure.
Généré par l'IA
C/25767/2020
Annulment of Bankruptcy Due to Subsequent Debt Payment
C/20017/2020
Bankruptcy Annulment Upon Subsequent Debt Payment
C/17672/2025
Bankruptcy Order Annulment Due to Subsequent Debt Payment
C/4404/2022
Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Debt Payment
C/1337/2020
Bankruptcy Annulment Due to Subsequent Debt Payment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 319 ss CPC

This article, cited under 'Vu en droit', likely forms the basis for the decision on the appeal, although the specific ground for annulment is primarily derived from the payment of the debt which overrides the need for bankruptcy.

art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This procedural article regarding the grounds for appeal was cited, although the primary order is based on the payment of the debt.

art. 174 LP

This article concerning bankruptcy proceedings was cited in the legal grounds considered by the court.

art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

The appeal was deemed admissible as it was filed in the time and form prescribed by these procedural rules.

art. 66 al. 1 LTF

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the appeal according to this provision (implied by the cost order, even if the article is mentioned in the appeal instructions section, costs are applied based on standard practice related to the procedure mentioned, but since cost order is explicit, this reference is commonly used for imposing costs). Note: The dispositive orders the costs according to cantonal law practice, but the appeal instructions reference LTF articles, thus referencing the cost imposition implicitly linked to the procedure.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/1907/2021

### [ACJC/367/2021](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/2639652) du 23.03.2021 sur JTPI/3584/2021 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2021/0003/ACJC_000367_2021_C_1907_2021.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourante : · Intimée :

A______ SARL ______ ______ · FONDATION LPP B______ ______ ______

C/1907/2021 ACJC/367/2021

DU mardi 23 mars 2021

Vu le jugement JTPI/3584/2021 du 15 mars 2021 prononçant la faillite de A______ SARL (ch. 1 du dispositif);

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 19 mars 2021 par A______ SARL, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/3584/2021 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 15 mars 2021 dans la cause C/1907/2021-8 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur

Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Laura SESSA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF;

RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*