Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/337/2020 • CJ GE ACJC/337/2020 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment

Numéro de cause ACJC/337/2020
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed an appeal against a lower court's judgment that declared the appellant bankrupt, noting that the appellant had subsequently paid the debt, interest, and costs due to the creditor. The court reasoned that because the debt underpinning the bankruptcy proceedings had been settled, the condition for annulling the bankruptcy declaration under the relevant procedural law was met, leading the court to overturn the bankruptcy order while affirming the remainder of the lower court's decision and ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal, which were compensated by the advance payment made.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, Art. 319 ss CPC, Art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment: The court reasoned that because the debt underpinning the bankruptcy proceedings had been settled, the condition for annulling the bankruptcy declaration under the relevant procedural law was met, leading the court to overturn the bankruptcy order while affirming the remainder of the lower court's decision and ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the appeal, which were compensated by the advance payment made.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure de faillite avance de frais paiement des intérêts dispositif du jugement opposition tardive contrôle de la procédure

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
The court cites this article in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies its application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*
Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
The court cites this article in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies its application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.
Art. 319 ss CPC
The court cites these articles in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies their application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.
Art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
This article was cited regarding the admissibility and form of the appeal filed by the appellant.
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision implicitly governs the imposition of costs for the appeal (although Art. 66 is not explicitly cited in the operative part, the order regarding costs references the standard legal framework for costs, and the instruction mentions citing cost provisions if present in the dispositive. However, since the costs are explicitly ordered based on the Cantonal rules implied by the final order structure, and no specific LTF article for costs is in the operative part other than procedural review instructions, only explicitly cited provisions are strictly retained. Given the strict rule, and absent explicit citation in the dispositive orders 'Annule...', 'Confirme...', 'Condamne...', only the articles leading to the primary annulment/confirmation are necessary unless costs citation is present. The operative part only states: 'Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours...' without citing an LTF article for costs. Thus, no cost provision is extracted based on the strict rule.)
Généré par l'IA
C/5516/2025
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment
C/23087/2022
Creditor Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration After Debt Payment
C/19272/2025
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Following Debt Repayment
C/12163/2022
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Declaration Upheld Due to Subsequent Debt Payment
C/292/2023
Appeal of Bankruptcy Judgment After Debt Payment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP

The court cites this article in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies its application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.

Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

The court cites this article in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies its application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.

Art. 319 ss CPC

The court cites these articles in the grounds for law, preceding the operative part, which implies their application in the decision to annul the bankruptcy.

Art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

This article was cited regarding the admissibility and form of the appeal filed by the appellant.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision implicitly governs the imposition of costs for the appeal (although Art. 66 is not explicitly cited in the operative part, the order regarding costs references the standard legal framework for costs, and the instruction mentions citing cost provisions if present in the dispositive. However, since the costs are explicitly ordered based on the Cantonal rules implied by the final order structure, and no specific LTF article for costs is in the operative part other than procedural review instructions, only explicitly cited provisions are strictly retained. Given the strict rule, and absent explicit citation in the dispositive orders 'Annule...', 'Confirme...', 'Condamne...', only the articles leading to the primary annulment/confirmation are necessary unless costs citation is present. The operative part only states: 'Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours...' without citing an LTF article for costs. Thus, no cost provision is extracted based on the strict rule.)

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

C/28236/2019

### [ACJC/337/2020](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/show/2351918) du 25.02.2020 sur JTPI/2140/2020 ( SFC ) , JUGE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/sommaires/file//2020/0003/ACJC_000337_2020_C_28236_2019.pdf)

[Par ces motifs](#PCM)

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Cour de justice civile · Chambre civile

Recourant : · Intimée :

Monsieur A______ ______ ______ · B______ [assurance-maladie] ______ ______

C/28236/2019 ACJC/337/2020

DU MARDI 25 fevrier 2020

Vu le jugement JTPI/2140/2020 du 6 février 2020 prononçant la faillite de A______ (ch. 1 du jugement) ;

Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 17 février 2020 par A______, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC ;

Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris ;

Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours ;

Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

La Chambre civile :

Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/2140/2020 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 6 février 2020 dans la cause C/28236/2019-5 SFC (poursuite N° 1______).

Confirme le jugement pour le surplus.

Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève.

Siégeant :

Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur

Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Mélanie DE RESENDE PEREIRA, greffière.

*Indication des voies de recours* *:*

*Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF;

RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.*

*Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.*