Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
ACJC/1675/2020 • CJ GE ACJC/1675/2020 Généré par l'IA

Bankruptcy Declaration Mooted by Subsequent Debt Payment on Appeal

Numéro de cause ACJC/1675/2020
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Genève (CH-GE)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a judgment that declared its bankruptcy. The appellate court reviewed the appeal and noted that the debt underlying the bankruptcy judgment had subsequently been paid, which rendered the initial bankruptcy declaration moot. Therefore, the court annulled the portion of the lower court's decision declaring the bankruptcy, while otherwise confirming the judgment, and imposed the costs of the appeal upon the appellant, which were offset by the advanced costs paid.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 174 LP, Art. 100 al. 1 LTF, art. 319 ss CPC, art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC, art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC, art. 72 ss LTF; Bankruptcy Declaration Mooted by Subsequent Debt Payment on Appeal: The appellate court reviewed the appeal and noted that the debt underlying the bankruptcy judgment had subsequently been paid, which rendered the initial bankruptcy declaration moot. Therefore, the court annulled the portion of the lower court's decision declaring the bankruptcy, while otherwise confirming the judgment, and imposed the costs of the appeal upon the appellant, which were offset by the advanced costs paid.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement de la dette annulation du jugement de faillite procédure de revendication dans la faillite faillite civile compensation en cas de faillite révision d'une décision

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 174 LP
This provision is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but is not explicitly cited in the operative orders.
Art. 100 al. 1 LTF
This provision is cited in the 'Indication des voies de recours' section regarding the deadline and form for appealing to the Federal Tribunal, not in the operative orders.
art. 319 ss CPC
This provision (along with Art. 174 LP and Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC) is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but the actual annulment of the bankruptcy order (chiffre 1 du dispositif) is the direct ruling of the court, and since the court does not explicitly cite the basis for *annulment* in the dispositive, we must look at the cited provisions in the reasoning leading to the decision to see if they justify the action. However, based strictly on the rule to only include provisions *actually used in its final orders* (the dispositive), and observing that the dispositive only contains the operative parts (Annule, Confirme, Condamne) without citing a specific legal basis for the annulment, we must look for procedural or cost citations in the dispositive. Since the operative part itself does not cite any legal provision, the only explicitly cited provisions in the operative section are those related to costs.
art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC
This provision is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but is not explicitly cited in the operative orders.
art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC
This provision is cited as the formal basis for filing the appeal (recours) but is not cited in the operative orders (dispositive) for the final ruling.
art. 72 ss LTF
These provisions are cited in the 'Indication des voies de recours' section regarding the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal, not in the operative orders.
Généré par l'IA
C/18602/2022
Appeal of Bankruptcy Declaration Mooted by Debt Payment
C/11528/2021
Moot Bankruptcy Appeal Due to Debt Payment
C/16586/2023
Moot Appeal Due to Debt Payment in Bankruptcy Case
C/10628/2022
Moot Appeal After Debt Payment in Bankruptcy Case
C/14016/2023
Moot Bankruptcy Appeal Due to Debt Payment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
art. 319 ss CPC

This provision (along with Art. 174 LP and Art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC) is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but the actual annulment of the bankruptcy order (chiffre 1 du dispositif) is the direct ruling of the court, and since the court does not explicitly cite the basis for *annulment* in the dispositive, we must look at the cited provisions in the reasoning leading to the decision to see if they justify the action. However, based strictly on the rule to only include provisions *actually used in its final orders* (the dispositive), and observing that the dispositive only contains the operative parts (Annule, Confirme, Condamne) without citing a specific legal basis for the annulment, we must look for procedural or cost citations in the dispositive. Since the operative part itself does not cite any legal provision, the only explicitly cited provisions in the operative section are those related to costs.

art. 174 LP

This provision is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but is not explicitly cited in the operative orders.

art. 309 let. b ch. 7 CPC

This provision is cited in the 'Vu en droit' section, but is not explicitly cited in the operative orders.

art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC

This provision is cited as the formal basis for filing the appeal (recours) but is not cited in the operative orders (dispositive) for the final ruling.

art. 100 al. 1 LTF

This provision is cited in the 'Indication des voies de recours' section regarding the deadline and form for appealing to the Federal Tribunal, not in the operative orders.

art. 72 ss LTF

These provisions are cited in the 'Indication des voies de recours' section regarding the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal, not in the operative orders.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

République et canton de Genève POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE Chambre civile Cour de justice civile

Recourante : Intimée : A______ SA Madame B______ ______ c/o Me C______ ______ ______ ______

C/18840/2020 ACJC/1675/2020 DU JEUDI 26 NOVEMBRE 2020 Vu le jugement JTPI/14319/2020 du 19 novembre 2020 prononçant la faillite de A______ SA (ch. 1 du dispositif) ; Vu le recours contre ledit jugement formé le 26 novembre 2020 par A______ SA, dans le délai et la forme prescrits par l'art. 321 al. 1 et 2 CPC ; Vu le paiement de la dette, intérêts et frais compris ; Attendu que l'attention de la partie recourante est expressément attirée sur le fait qu'une nouvelle faillite la concernant, qui serait prononcée postérieurement à la réception du présent arrêt, ne sera plus rétractée, sauf si elle prouve sa solvabilité par pièces, jointes au recours ; Vu en droit les articles 174 LP, 309 let. b ch. 7 et 319 ss CPC.

PAR CES MOTIFS, La Chambre civile : Annule le chiffre 1 du dispositif du jugement de faillite N° JTPI/14319/2020 rendu par le Tribunal de première instance le 19 novembre 2020 dans la cause C/18840/2020-8 SFC (poursuite N° 1______). Confirme le jugement pour le surplus. Condamne la partie recourante aux frais du recours, taxés à 220 fr., et dit qu'ils sont compensés par l'avance de frais de même montant fournie par elle, qui reste acquise à l'Etat de Genève. Siégeant : Madame Pauline ERARD, présidente; Madame Nathalie LANDRY-BARTHE, Monsieur Ivo BUETTI, juges; Madame Mélanie DE RESENDE PEREIRA, greffière.

Indication des voies de recours :

Conformément aux art. 72 ss de la loi fédérale sur le Tribunal fédéral du 17 juin 2005 (LTF; RS 173.110), le présent arrêt peut être porté dans les trente jours qui suivent sa notification avec expédition complète (art. 100 al. 1 LTF) par-devant le Tribunal fédéral par la voie du recours en matière civile.

Le recours doit être adressé au Tribunal fédéral, 1000 Lausanne 14.

Communiqué le dispositif du présent arrêt aux parties par plis recommandés, ainsi qu'à l'Office des faillites, à l'Office des poursuites, au Registre du commerce et au Registre foncier le 01.12.2020.