Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 3/2005 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2005:I.R.3.2005 AI generated

Subsequent cumulative enforcement measures keep jurisdiction with the original enforcement court under ZIZ Art. 34(3).

Case Number Sklep I R 3/2005
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ruled that the District Court in Žalc retained jurisdiction over a subsequent enforcement application filed by the creditor. The creditor had previously obtained a final enforcement order against the debtor's bank accounts, and now sought enforcement against the debtor's real estate. The court held that under the Law on Enforcement and Security, when new enforcement measures are cumulatively added, the territorial jurisdiction follows the original enforcement measure, thereby dismissing the lower court's claim of incompetence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 34(3) ZIZ; Art. 17(3) ZPP in conjunction with Art. 15 ZIZ: In cases of subsequent cumulative enforcement measures, the territorial jurisdiction of the enforcement court is determined by the first enforcement measure.

Keywords

AI generated
subsequent cumulative enforcement territorial jurisdiction enforcement Law on Enforcement Security enforcement court competence creditor new enforcement measure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 34(3) of the Law on Enforcement and Security (ZIZ)
Art. 17(3) of the Law on Civil Procedure (ZPP) in conjunction with Art. 15 ZIZ
AI generated
VSC sklep Rg 7/2009
Enforcement proceeding against employee; creditor's request to employer to pay arrears handled in same case.
Sklep I R 66/2002
Supreme Court transfers case to Celje Court due to employee's employment at Žalec Court raising impartiality doubts.
VSL sklep II Ip 3886/2013
Appeal dismissed; unclear bill of exchange claim and ambiguous deadline make debtor's 8-day objection timely.
Sklep I R 112/2009
Supreme Court rules that the court of the debtor's declared residence determines jurisdiction for money execution proceedings.
Sklep I R 50/2010
Slovenian Supreme Court allows transfer of civil case due to potential bias from judge's daughter being the debtor.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

V tej izvršilni zadevi je pristojno Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu.

[JEDRO]

V primeru naknadne kumulacije izvršilnih sredstev je perpetuirana pristojnost izvršilnega sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu je izdalo sklep, da ni krajevno pristojno za odločanje v tej zadevi in da bo po pravnomočnosti sklepa odstopilo zadevo Okrajnemu sodišču v Brežicah. Okrajno sodišče v Brežicah je sprožilo spor o krajevni pristojnosti. Ugotovilo je namreč, da je Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu s pravnomočnim sklepom o izvršbi, opr. št. I 1460/2004 z dne 25.10.2004, zaradi izterjave upnikovih terjatev že dovolilo predlagano izvršbo na dolžnikovih računih. Upnik je dne 30.11.2004 predlagal nadaljevanje izvršilnega postopka z novim izvršilnim sredstvom in sicer z izvršbo na dolžnikovih nepremičninah. Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu se je s tem v zvezi izreklo za krajevno nepristojno za odločanje o upnikovem predlogu.

Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da je za odločanje v izvršilni zadevi pristojno Okrajno sodišče v Žalcu.

Upnik je predlagal novo izvršilno sredstvo in gre zato za naknadno kumulacijo izvršilnih sredstev. To stanje ureja tretji odstavek 34. člena Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju (ZIZ, Ur.l. RS, št. 51/98 - 16/2004). V takšnem primeru se krajevna pristojnost ravna po prvo navedenem sredstvu izvršbe. Podlaga za takšno odločitev je v določbah tretjega odstavka 17. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku v zvezi s 15. členom ZIZ.