Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 216/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:II.IPS.216.2004 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where appellate court had not yet ruled on the appeal.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 216/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia declared the appeal withdrawn because the appellate court had not yet made a decision on the merits. The opposing party had previously lost a lower court case regarding the return of seized property and filed a timely appeal, which was served to the court and the Prosecutor's Office. Since the appellate court had not yet examined the appeal, the Supreme Court merely confirmed the withdrawal without addressing the substantive legal arguments.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

375. člen ZPP; 383. člen ZPP; 37. člen ZNP: If the appellate court has not yet decided on an appeal, the withdrawal of the appeal is confirmed without examining the merits.

Keywords

AI generated
appeal withdrawal supreme court procedure appellate court decision civil procedure law seized property restitution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Revizija je bila vročena nasprotni stranki in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu RS (375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Ur.
383. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
37. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku
AI generated
Sklep II Ips 120/2004
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where defendant withdrew appeal before second instance court ruling.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1818/2018
Appeal dismissed; contract validity prevails over unfulfilled expropriation purpose, barring higher compensation claims.
VSRS Sodba I Ips 58314/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on theft conviction, upholding defendant's valid waiver of presence rights.
Sodba II Ips 943/2008
Court rejects appeal, holding worker partially liable for own safety but upholding reduced non-property damage compensation.
Sklep II Ips 897/94
Supreme Court allows appeal against seizure compensation, ruling State Forests are state entities not local municipalities.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je le ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo o zahtevku predlagateljice za vrnitev zaplenjenega premoženja in naložilo nasprotni udeleženki plačilo odškodnine v obveznicah v skladu z Zakonom o izdaji obveznic za plačilo odškodnine za zaplenjeno premoženje zaradi razveljavitve kazni zaplembe premoženja. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo nasprotne udeleženke in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep.

Zoper tako pravnomočno odločbo je nasprotna udeleženka vložila pravočasno revizijo.

Revizija je bila vročena nasprotni stranki in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu RS (375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Ur. l. RS, št. 36/04 - p.b., ZPP).

S pisno vlogo, ki je na sodišče prispela 21.6.2004, je nasprotna udeleženka umaknila vloženo revizijo.

Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je le ugotovilo njen umik (383. člen v zvezi s 334. členom ZPP in v zvezi s 37. členom Zakona o nepravdnem postopku).