Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 84/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:I.R.84.2004 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects transfer of enforcement case due to lack of weighty reasons under ZPP Art. 67.

Case Number Sklep I R 84/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected a request to transfer an enforcement proceeding to another court. The applicant argued that the debtor's sister, who was the enforcement officer at the local court, should trigger a transfer under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court held that the presence of a relative does not constitute a weighty reason for transfer since another judge could conduct the proceedings, and the request was therefore dismissed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; A request to transfer proceedings based solely on the debtor's relative being the enforcement officer is rejected as it lacks weighty reasons, and the court must proceed with another judge if necessary.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement proceedings transfer of jurisdiction weighty reasons Civil Procedure Act enforcement officer relative of debtor procedural transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS Sklep III R 5/2021
Supreme Court assigns exclusive jurisdiction to Ljubljana District Court for copyright-related enforcement disputes.
Sklep I R 49/2005
Supreme Court confirms original court jurisdiction for continuing enforcement with new means under ZIZ Art. 35.
Sklep I R 189/2007
Supreme Court rules local court in Sevnici has jurisdiction over enforcement of bank account funds based on debtor's residence.
Sklep I R 112/2005
Supreme Court transfers enforcement case to another court due to employee's employment at the original court raising impartiality doubts.
VSRS Sklep I R 49/2022
Supreme Court dismisses premature jurisdiction dispute when general court transfers case to labor court without opposing jurisdiction.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog za določitev drugega pristojnega sodišča se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Dolžničina sestra - izvršilna sodnica ni edina sodnica na tem sodišču, kar pomeni, da bo lahko postopek vodila druga sodnica in tako ni potrebno zadeve prenašati na drugo sodišče. Kolikor pa predlog meri na izločitev vseh sodnic tega sodišča, ni mogoče o stvari odločati na podlagi predpisov o smotrni delegaciji, marveč po postopku in materialnopravnih določbah tretjega poglavja ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnica je na Okrajnem sodišču v Radovljici vložila predlog za izvršbo na podlagi verodostojne listine. To sodišče je predlagalo, naj vrhovno sodišče na podlagi 67. člena ZPP določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ker je dolžnica sestra izvršilne sodnice tega sodišča.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če so za to dani tehtni razlogi (67. člen ZPP). Vendar med te ni mogoče uvrstiti navedenega razloga. Dolžničina sestra - izvršilna sodnica ni edina sodnica na tem sodišču, kar pomeni, da bo lahko postopek vodila druga sodnica in tako ni potrebno zadeve prenašati na drugo sodišče. Kolikor pa predlog meri na izločitev vseh sodnic tega sodišča, ni mogoče o stvari odločati na podlagi predpisov o smotrni delegaciji, marveč po postopku in materialnopravnih določbah tretjega poglavja ZPP. Zaradi povedanega je bilo treba predlog zavrniti.