Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 73/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:I.R.73.2004 AI generated

Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Celje because a party works at the Konjic court.

Case Number Sklep I R 73/2004
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia delegated jurisdiction from the Okrajno sodišče in Slovenskih Konjic to the Okrajno sodišče in Celju. The plaintiff, employed at the Konjic court, requested this transfer under Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure. The court granted the request because the plaintiff's employment at the original venue constituted a significant reason for easier proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure; if a party is employed at the originally competent court, the Supreme Court may delegate jurisdiction to another competent court to facilitate proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
delegation of jurisdiction civil procedure law employee employment status court venue transfer procedural efficiency Supreme Court decision competent court designation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Act on Civil Procedure
AI generated
Sklep I R 19/2003
Supreme Court transfers case to Maribor due to alleged misconduct at the original court's execution department.
VSRS Sklep I R 57/2025
Supreme Court transfers custody of mental health admission case to Maribor court for efficiency.
Sklep I R 101/2010
Supreme Court allows transfer of case due to potential bias from staff member assisting court.
Sklep I R 134/2011
Slovenian Supreme Court transfers case jurisdiction to ensure public perception of judicial impartiality.
VSRS Sklep I R 71/2017
Supreme Court allows delegation of jurisdiction to another court when a party is employed there to ensure impartiality.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej pravdni zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Celju.

[JEDRO]

Predlog za delegacijo je utemeljen, ker je ena od strank zaposlena na krajevno pristojnem sodišču.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

V tej pravdni zadevi, ki teče pred Okrajnim sodiščem v Slovenskih Konjicah, je to sodišče, ki je za odločanje stvarno in krajevno pristojno, predlagalo delegacijo pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ker je tožnica zaposlena pri krajevno pristojnem sodišču.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko vrhovno sodišče na predlog stranke ali sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da obravnava zadevo, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Med navedene tehtne razloge vsekakor spada okoliščina, da je ena od pravdnih strank zaposlena pri stvarno in krajevno pristojnem sodišču, v tem primeru Okrajnem sodišču v Slovenskih Konjicah. Zato je bilo treba predlogu za delegacijo ugoditi in določiti drugo bližnje krajevno pristojno sodišče, Okrajno sodišče v Celju.