Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSRS Sklep II DoR 313/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2026:II.DOR.313.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court resumes proceedings after EU Court of Justice delivers preliminary ruling on consumer contract terms.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 313/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia ordered the resumption of proceedings following a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The EU Court issued a decision on the interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive in a related case. Consequently, the Supreme Court lifted its earlier suspension of the review admissibility process under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 208(2) of the Act on Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court must resume proceedings when the Court of Justice of the European Union delivers a decision on a preliminary ruling request.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling European Union consumer contracts procedural resumption civil procedure law unfair terms directive supreme court

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 208(2) of the Act on Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case C-368/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je s sklepom z dne 1. 10. 2025 prekinilo postopek odločanja o predlogu za dopustitev revizije do odločitve Sodišča Evropske unije o podanem predlogu za predhodno odločanje glede razlage členov 6(1) in 7(1) Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah v zadevi II Ips 14/2025.

Sodišče Evropske unije je s sklepom C-368/25 z dne 24. 2. 2026 o podanem predlogu odločilo, zato je Vrhovno sodišče ugotovilo, da se postopek nadaljuje (drugi odstavek 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).