Legislator Case Law & Legislation
Sklep II Ips 345/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:II.IPS.345.2003 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal in property dispute where claim value under 1 million SIT threshold. Appeal rejected due to statutory monetary limit. Court applies ZPP Art. 367(2) and 377. Appeal dismissed because claim value under 1 million SIT threshold. Court applies ZPP Art. 367(2) and 377. Appeal dismissed because claim value under 1 million SIT threshold. Court applies ZPP Art. 367(2) and 377.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 345/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's appeal against a first-instance judgment awarding 920,000 SIT in damages for motor mower accident injuries. The applicant argued for a review based on erroneous application of substantive law, but the review court lacked jurisdiction due to the claim's value falling below the 1,000,000 SIT threshold. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible under the Code of Civil Procedure, leaving the lower court's decision final.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, drugi odstavek 367. člena; 377. člen: In property disputes, a review is permitted only if the value of the contested part of the final judgment exceeds 1,000,000 SIT; otherwise, the review court is not authorized to accept the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
property dispute appeal review jurisdiction threshold monetary value limit Code of Civil Procedure inadmissible review damages claim value final judgment review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
second paragraph of Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

V premoženjskih sporih je revizija dovoljena, če vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe presega 1.000.000 SIT. Ker v konkretnem primeru ta vrednost ni presežena, je revizijsko sodišče nedovoljeno revizijo zavrglo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožničin zahtevek, da ji mora toženec plačati 920.000 SIT odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo, ki jo je utrpela v nesreči z motorno kosilnico. Pritožbeno sodišče je njeno pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

Zoper to sodbo je tožnica vložila revizijo zaradi zmotne uporabe materialnega prava.

Revizija je bila vročena tožencu, ki nanjo ni odgovoril, in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu Republike Slovenije.

Revizija ni dovoljena.

V premoženjskih sporih je revizija dovoljena, če vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe presega 1.000.000 SIT (drugi odstavek 367. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 - 2/2004 - ZPP). Ker v konkretnem primeru ta vrednost ni presežena, je revizijsko sodišče nedovoljeno revizijo zavrglo (377. člen ZPP).