Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSRS Sklep II DoR 214/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2026:II.DOR.214.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court resumes proceedings after EU Court of Justice rules on preliminary ruling request.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 214/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ordered the continuation of proceedings following a preliminary ruling request to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The EU Court of Justice issued a decision on February 24, 2026, regarding the interpretation of consumer protection directives, which necessitated the resumption of the domestic case. Consequently, the Supreme Court lifted the previous suspension of the review admissibility procedure under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 208(2) of the Act on Civil Procedure; The Supreme Court must resume proceedings when the Court of Justice of the European Union issues a decision on a preliminary ruling request.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling EU Court of Justice civil procedure procedural suspension consumer protection directives

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 208(2) of the Act on Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case C-368/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je s sklepom z 2. 7. 2025 prekinilo postopek odločanja o predlogu za dopustitev revizije do odločitve Sodišča Evropske unije o predlogu za sprejem predhodne odločbe o razlagi členov 6(1) in 7(1) Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah v zadevi II Ips 14/2025.

Sodišče Evropske unije je s sklepom C-368/25 s 24. 2. 2026 o podanem predlogu odločilo, zato je Vrhovno sodišče ugotovilo, da se postopek nadaljuje (drugi odstavek 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).