Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VSRS Sklep II DoR 1/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2026:II.DOR.1.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court resumes proceedings after EU Court of Justice rejects preliminary ruling request.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 1/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia ordered the continuation of proceedings following a preliminary ruling request to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The EU Court of Justice rejected the request on April 5, 2026, regarding consumer contract terms under Directive 93/13/EEC. Consequently, the Supreme Court lifted its earlier suspension and allowed the domestic case to proceed under Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure; When the Court of Justice of the European Union rejects a request for a preliminary ruling, the referring court must resume the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling EU Court of Justice consumer protection procedural suspension continuation of proceedings Directive 93/13/EEC Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure
Directive 93/13/EEC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case C-368/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je s sklepom z dne 18. 6. 2025 prekinilo postopek odločanja o predlogu za dopustitev revizije do odločitve Sodišča Evropske unije o predlogu za sprejem predhodne odločbe o razlagi členov 6(1) in 7(1) Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah v zadevi II Ips 14/2025.

Sodišče Evropske unije je s sklepom C-368/25 z dne 24. 2. 2026 o podanem predlogu odločilo, zato je Vrhovno sodišče ugotovilo, da se postopek nadaljuje (drugi odstavek 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).