Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 465/2024 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2026:II.DOR.465.2024 AI generated

Supreme Court resumes proceedings after EU Court of Justice rejects preliminary ruling request.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 465/2024
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia resumed the proceedings following a decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The EU Court rejected the request for a preliminary ruling on consumer contract terms, prompting the Supreme Court to lift its earlier suspension. Consequently, the domestic legal process continues under the relevant procedural code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku, drugi odstavek 208. člena: When the Court of Justice of the European Union rejects a request for a preliminary ruling, the national court must resume the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling European Union procedural suspension consumer protection supreme court procedural resumption preliminary reference

Cited Legislation

AI generated
second paragraph of Article 208 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case C-368/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je s sklepom z dne 18. 6. 2025 prekinilo postopek odločanja o predlogu za dopustitev revizije do odločitve Sodišča Evropske unije o predlogu za sprejem predhodne odločbe o razlagi členov 6(1) in 7(1) Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah v zadevi II Ips 14/2025.

Sodišče Evropske unije je s sklepom C-368/25 z dne 24. 2. 2026 o podanem predlogu odločilo, zato je Vrhovno sodišče ugotovilo, da se postopek nadaljuje (drugi odstavek 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).