Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VSRS Sklep II DoR 158/2025 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2026:II.DOR.158.2025 AI generated

Supreme Court resumes proceedings after EU Court of Justice delivers preliminary ruling on consumer contract terms.

Case Number VSRS Sklep II DoR 158/2025
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia resumed the proceedings following a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The lower court had suspended the process pending the CJEU's interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive. The court applied Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure to lift the suspension upon the CJEU's decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure; Upon the Court of Justice of the European Union delivering a preliminary ruling, the national court must resume the proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
preliminary ruling Code of Civil Procedure suspension of proceedings European Union law consumer contract terms resumption of case preliminary question

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 208(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Case C-368/25

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[JEDRO]

Ugotovi se, da se postopek nadaljuje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Vrhovno sodišče je s sklepom z dne 18. 6. 2025 prekinilo postopek odločanja o predlogu za dopustitev revizije do odločitve Sodišča Evropske unije o predlogu za sprejem predhodne odločbe o razlagi členov 6(1) in 7(1) Direktive Sveta 93/13/EGS z dne 5. aprila 1993 o nedovoljenih pogojih v potrošniških pogodbah v zadevi II Ips 14/2025.

Sodišče Evropske unije je s sklepom C-368/25 z dne 24. 2. 2026 o podanem predlogu odločilo, zato je Vrhovno sodišče ugotovilo, da se postopek nadaljuje (drugi odstavek 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).