Appeal against a ruling to invalidate a jurisdiction clause is dismissed as the ruling does not end the proceedings. The court held that only rulings concluding the proceedings allow for an appeal. The court rejected the appeal because the ruling to invalidate the jurisdiction clause did not conclude the proceedings. The court ruled that appeals are only permitted against rulings that legally conclude the proceedings. The court determined that the ruling to invalidate the jurisdiction clause did not legally conclude the proceedings. The court found that the ruling to invalidate the jurisdiction clause did not legally conclude the proceedings.
Slovenia (SI)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's appeal against the first-instance court's ruling to invalidate a jurisdiction clause. The appellant argued that this ruling prevented the final judgment from becoming legally binding, but the court found no merit in this claim. The court decided that since the ruling did not legally conclude the proceedings, an appeal was not permitted under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Legislator headnote
AI generated1. odstavek 384. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; 377. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku: Appeals are only admissible against rulings that legally conclude the proceedings; a ruling to invalidate a jurisdiction clause does not constitute such a concluding ruling.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedFull text
Revizija se zavrže.
[JEDRO]
Ker sklep o zavrnitvi predloga za razveljavitev klavzule pravnomočnosti ne predstavlja sklepa, s katerim bi bil postopek pravnomočno končan, revizija zoper njega ni dovoljena.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožničin predlog za razveljavitev klavzule pravnomočnosti sodbe z dne 8.5.2001, opr. št. P 99/2000. Tožničino pritožbo zoper ta sklep je pritožbeno sodišče zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep prve stopnje.
Zoper ta sklep vlaga tožnica revizijo in predlaga spremembo, podrejeno pa zavrnitev.
Revizija ni dovoljena.
Stranke lahko vložijo revizijo tudi zoper sklep sodišča druge stopnje, s katerim je bil postopek pravnomočno končan (1. odstavek 384. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 - 2/2004 - ZPP). Ker pa sklep o zavrnitvi predloga za razveljavitev klavzule pravnomočnosti ne predstavlja sklepa, s katerim bi bil postopek pravnomočno končan (z njim namreč ni odločeno o pritožbi, ki naj bi po tožničinem mnenju preprečevala nastop pravnomočnosti), je revizijsko sodišče revizijo zavrglo (377. člen ZPP).