Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 71/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:I.R.68.2003 AI generated

Dismissed request to transfer jurisdiction based on dissatisfaction with prior rulings and unfair trial fears.

Case Number Sklep I R 71/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiff's request to transfer jurisdiction to another competent court. The parties argued that the current court could not hear the case fairly due to prior rulings by the District Court in Kranj. The court held that mere dissatisfaction with previous decisions or an expectation of unfairness does not constitute a valid ground for transferring jurisdiction under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Dissatisfaction with prior rulings or an expectation of an unfair trial cannot serve as a substantial reason for the Supreme Court to delegate jurisdiction to another competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
transfer of jurisdiction Supreme Court powers unfair trial claim procedural fairness district court rulings

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSRS Sklep I R 195/2024
Appeal dismissed; mere acquaintance between lawyer and judge does not prove bias under ZPP Art. 67.
VSRS Sklep I R 27/2022
Former judge's past role in small court triggers transfer of custody due to impartiality doubts.
Sklep I R 30/2002
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer request where client's relative is retired court employee.
Sklep I R 31/97
Supreme Court allows transfer of case to another court due to judge's relative to plaintiff's family member.
VSRS Sklep III R 34/2016
Appeal dismissed: Same judge leading bankruptcy and related litigation does not automatically violate impartiality rights.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlogu za prenos pristojnosti se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Nezadovoljstvo stranke z odločbami v drugih postopkih, ki so tekli pred Okrožnim sodiščem v Kranju in pričakovanje nepoštenega sojenja v tej zadevi, ne more predstavljati tehtnega razloga za delegacijo pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožeči stranki predlagata prenos pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ki bi bilo "sposobno zadevo obravnavati nepristransko in pošteno".

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Vrhovno sodišče lahko na podlagi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Uradni list RS, št. 26/99 in 96/2002) na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča določi, da v zadevi postopa drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek ali če so zato drugi tehtni razlogi. Vrhovno sodišče ugotavlja, da okoliščine, ki jih uveljavljata tožeči stranki, niso razlogi iz 67. člena ZPP. Nezadovoljstvo stranke z odločbami v drugih postopkih, ki so tekli pred Okrožnim sodiščem v Kranju in pričakovanje nepoštenega sojenja v tej zadevi, ne more predstavljati tehtnega razloga za delegacijo pristojnosti. Morebitno nezadovoljstvo s sodno odločbo bo namreč stranka lahko uveljavljala le v za to predvidenem in določenem postopku, torej v postopku s pravnimi sredstvi. Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog za prenos pristojnosti zavrnilo.