Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 95/2003 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:II.IPS.95.2003 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal withdrawal request, confirming first instance judgment on debt and interest.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 95/2003
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal, thereby upholding the lower court's judgment. The first instance court ordered the defendant to pay a principal sum of 9,568,671.70 SIT plus statutory interest, while the second instance court partially modified the ruling to include interest from October 25, 1996. Since the appellant withdrew the appeal after the second instance judgment was rendered, the court confirmed the lower court's decision without further review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o sodnem postopku; Zakon o sodiščih: When a party withdraws an appeal after the second instance judgment is rendered, the court must accept the withdrawal and confirm the judgment of the second instance court.

Keywords

AI generated
withdrawal of appeal second instance judgment confirmation of judgment civil procedure law supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Zakon o sodnem postopku
Zakon o sodiščih
AI generated
Sodba II Ips 372/98
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on tort damages for pain and suffering and reduced life activity. Appeal rejected due to insufficient evidence of pre-existing condition causing current disability.
VSL sklep I Cp 442/2000
Appeal allowed; first instance dismissed due to failure to address all material facts regarding contract performance.
VSK sklep I Cp 1096/2004
Appeal allowed; court reduced costs by excluding unclaimed advance deposit for temporary counsel.
Sodba II Ips 492/2001
Supreme Court rejects appeal; third-party property right, not police seizure, triggers seller liability under ZOR Art. 510.
VSL sklep I Cp 183/95
Sale of construction sites constitutes trade; failure to prove exclusive prepayment condition requires retrial for interest claims.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Umik revizije.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je toženi stranki naložilo, da mora tožnikoma nerazdelno plačati znesek 9.568.671,70 SIT z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi od posameznih zneskov, ki predstavljajo dosojeno glavnico. Pritožbi tožene stranke je sodišče druge stopnje delno ugodilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje v izreku o zamudnih obresti spremenilo tako, da je toženi stranki naložilo plačilo zakonskih zamudnih obresti od glavnice v dosojenem znesku in za čas od 25.10.1996 dalje do plačila. V preostalem delu pa je pritožbo zavrnilo in sodbo sodišča prve stopnje potrdilo.

Tožeča stranka je proti sodbi sodišča druge stopnje vložila revizijo zaradi zmotne uporabe materialnega prava in predlagala njeno spremembo z ugoditvijo tožbenemu zahtevku v celoti, kar bi pomenilo zavrnitev pritožbe tožene stranke in potrditev sodbe sodišča prve stopnje.

Dne 2.6.2003 pa je tožeča stranka podala pisno izjavo, s katero je revizijo proti sodbi sodišča druge stopnje umaknila. Revizijsko sodišče je umik revizije vzelo na znanje.