Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 130/2002 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:I.R.130.2002 AI generated

Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction in enforcement proceedings based solely on relatives of parties and court staff.

Case Number Sklep I R 130/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the request to transfer jurisdiction in an enforcement proceeding. The lower court proposed the transfer because a party's wife was employed at the current court and another party had a related inheritance dispute. The Supreme Court ruled that mere family ties between parties and court staff, or existing related lawsuits, do not constitute sufficient grounds for transferring jurisdiction under the relevant procedural law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

67. člen ZPP; 15. člen ZIZZ: The Supreme Court may transfer jurisdiction only if there are significant reasons for easier proceedings, and mere kinship between parties and court employees or related disputes do not qualify as such reasons.

Keywords

AI generated
enforcement proceedings transfer of jurisdiction kinship with court staff procedural efficiency Supreme Court review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
67. člen ZPP
15. člen Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju
AI generated
Sklep I R 28/2014
Supreme Court dismisses transfer request when a court is sued for damages in a separate proceeding regarding a servitude claim.
Sklep I R 15/97
Supreme Court rejects jurisdiction delegation due to lack of compelling reasons in early enforcement phase.
Sklep I R 42/2008
Supreme Court delegates jurisdiction to Jesenices District Court due to apparent bias of Radovljica Court against a judge sitting there.
VSRS sklep I R 62/2015
Supreme Court rejects request to transfer case due to dissatisfaction and unproven conflict of interest claims.
VSRS Sklep I R 103/2016
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses request to delegate jurisdiction due to family ties of defendants to court clerk.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

V izvršilnem postopku zgolj sorodstvene vezi med strankami in sodnim osebjem še niso razlog za prenos pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v Krškem je v tej izvršilni zadevi predlagalo prenos pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ker je pri stvarno in krajevno pristojnem sodišču kot ... zaposlena M. Š., ki je svakinja dolžnice in svakinja upnika. Poleg tega je mož M. Š. v sporu z dolžnico zaradi zapuščine.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Vrhovno sodišče lahko na podlagi 67. člena ZPP (Zakona o pravdnem postopku - 1999) na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča določi, da v zadevi postopa drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Tak predlog se lahko na podlagi navedene zakonske določbe v zvezi s 15. členom Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju vloži tudi v izvršilnem postopku. Vendar vrhovno sodišče meni, da svaštvo dolžnice z eno od uslužbenk sodišča, pri katerem teče izvršilni postopek, ne predstavlja tehtnega razloga za prenos pristojnosti, takega razloga pa ne predstavlja niti drugi sorodstveni spor, ki je naveden v predlogu. Pri tej oceni je vrhovno sodišče moralo upoštevati tudi naravo izvršilnega postopka. Zato je zavrnilo neutemeljen predlog za prenos pristojnosti.