Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 463/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2003:II.IPS.463.2001 AI generated

Supreme Court corrects lower court decision title from 'ruling' to 'judgment' due to clerical error.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 463/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia issued a corrective ruling to amend a previous decision that was erroneously labeled as a 'ruling' instead of a 'judgment.' The procedural error stemmed from a clear clerical mistake in the original document's classification. The court exercised its authority under the Civil Procedure Act to rectify this formal defect without addressing the underlying merits of the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) 328. odst. 1; The president of the senate may issue a corrective ruling to amend a decision if a clear clerical error affects its designation or essential content.

Keywords

AI generated
clerical error correction judgment vs ruling distinction supreme court authority civil procedure law formal defect amendment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
328. odst. 1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Odločba tega sodišča opr.št. II Ips 463/2001 z dne 7.11.2002 se popravi, tako da se:

1. oznaka odločbe glasi Sodba v imenu ljudstva - in ne "sklep", 2. navedba, kako je Vrhovno sodišče o reviziji odločilo, v skladu s tem glasi, da je Vrhovno sodišče na seji senata dne 7.11.2002 razsodilo - in ne "sklenilo", da se revizija zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Poprava odločbe s popravnim sklepom.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri naknadni obdelavi odločbe opr.št. II Ips 463/2001 z dne 7.11.2002 je bilo ugotovljeno, da je odločba zaradi očitne pisne pomote označena kot "sklep", namesto pravilno kot sodba. To napako je bilo treba odpraviti s tem popravnim sklepom. Zanj ima predsednik senata pooblastilo v prvem odstavku 328. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (Ur. l. RS 26/99).