Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 3/2002 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2002:I.R.3.2002 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to plaintiff's employment at the original court.

Case Number Sklep I R 3/2002
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia designated the District Court in Cerknica to handle the case instead of the originally competent court. The plaintiff, employed at the original court as a registrar, requested the transfer to avoid potential conflicts of interest. The court ruled that the plaintiff's employment constitutes a significant reason for transferring the proceedings to a different court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; The Supreme Court may designate another competent court to proceed with a case if there are significant reasons, such as the plaintiff's employment at the originally competent court.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure court designation conflict of interest plaintiff employment jurisdiction transfer

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act (ZPP) 1999
AI generated
Sklep I R 5/95
Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to defendant's long-term clerkship there.
Sklep I R 52/2006
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request based on family ties to former court employee.
Sklep I R 91/2008
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer of jurisdiction request based on plaintiff's clerkship at the court.
Sklep I R 19/2001
Court dismisses case and transfers jurisdiction to Celje because plaintiff is court clerk at Žalec court.
Sklep I R 93/2007
Slovenian Supreme Court allows transfer of case to another court due to judge's relationship with a party.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v Cerknici.

[JEDRO]

Tožnik zaposlen pri krajevno in stvarno pristojnem sodišču - razlog za delegacijo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Tožnik je proti tožencu vložil tožbo zaradi plačila zneska 1,508.823,00 SIT pri čemer jo je naslovil na stvarno in krajevno pristojno Okrajno sodišče ....

Okrajno sodišče ... pa je dne 24.12.2001 podalo predlog, naj v zadevi postopa drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ki ni krajevno pristojno, ker je tožnik T. T. zaposlen pri Okrajnem sodišču ... kot pravdni in izvršilni vpisničar.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po določbi 67. člena ZPP (Zakona o pravdnem postopku - 1999) lahko vrhovno sodišče na predlog pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če so za to tehtni razlogi. Okoliščina, da je tožnik zaposlen pri stvarno in krajevno pristojnem sodišču kot pravdni in izvršilni vpisničar je gotovo tako tehten razlog, da je možno uporabiti določbo 67. člena ZPP in zadevo prenesti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, Okrajno sodišče v Cerknici.