Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep I R 64/2001 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:I.R.64.2001 AI generated

Supreme Court transfers child custody case to another district court because the plaintiff is a judge there.

Case Number Sklep I R 64/2001
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia designated the District Court in Kranj as the competent court for the pending child custody dispute. The plaintiff, who is a judge at the District Court in Ljubljana, successfully argued that her position constitutes a significant reason under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act to transfer the case. The Court agreed, ruling that the conflict of interest necessitates the transfer to a geographically closer and impartial court.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; The Supreme Court may designate another competent court if it is evident that the proceedings will be conducted more easily or if there are other significant reasons, such as the plaintiff being a judge at the originally designated court.

Keywords

AI generated
conflict of interest judicial impartiality child custody proceedings transfer of jurisdiction Civil Procedure Act significant reason geographical proximity

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
AI generated
VSRS sklep I R 108/2014
Supreme Court transfers custody case jurisdiction to preserve court appearance of impartiality.
VSRS Sklep I R 81/2017
Supreme Court delegates civil case to Murska Sobota court due to plaintiff's family tie to local court staff ensuring impartiality.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 4/2026
Appeal partially allowed; court voids first-instance rejection of father's school transfer request due to new facts.
VSRS sklep I R 76/2015
Supreme Court transfers case to another competent court due to employee's presence threatening public impartiality trust.
VSL Sklep IV Cp 2163/2018
Court dismisses appeal in upholds first instance decision favoring mother's choice of kindergarten location for child's benefit.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrožno sodišče v Kranju.

[JEDRO]

Dejstvo, da je tožnica sodnica za odločanje v sporu pristojnega sodišča, predstavlja tehten razlog po 67. členu ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrožnem sodišču v ... je med pravdnima strankama v teku postopek zaradi odločitve o vzgoji in varstvu otroka pravdnih strank po razpadu zunajzakonske skupnosti njegovih staršev.

Okrožno sodišče v ... je predlagalo delegacijo pristojnosti. Kot razlog je navedlo, da je otrokova mati sodnica Okrožnega sodišča v ..., tedaj sodišča pri katerem je v teku pravdni postopek.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku (v nadaljevanju ZPP) lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Dejstvo, da je tožnica sodnica Okrožnega sodišča v ..., predstavlja tehten razlog po 67. členu ZPP. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije predlogu ugodilo in določilo drugo sodišče, ki je stvarno pristojno in je v krajevni bližini.