Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 312/2000 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2001:II.IPS.312.2000 AI generated

Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal against second-instance judgment due to lack of statutory appeal right and unassessed case value.

Case Number Sklep II Ips 312/2000
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Slovenia (SI)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicants' appeal against the second-instance court's decision, which had dismissed their incomplete lawsuit. The applicants argued they properly amended their claims due to possession disturbance and claimed ignorance of the law, but the court found no statutory basis for such an appeal in this specific procedure. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed because the law governing incomplete lawsuits did not provide for a review mechanism, and the case value remained unassessed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

375. odstavek 375. člen ZPP; 377. člen ZPP: Review against a second-instance judgment is an extraordinary remedy permitted only by specific law; in proceedings for incomplete applications, no review right exists unless the disputed value exceeds 1.000.000 SIT and the value is assessed.

Keywords

AI generated
incomplete lawsuit procedure review against second instance case value assessment extraordinary remedy possession disturbance claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
375. odstavek 375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
377. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
AI generated
VSL Sklep I Cp 594/2021
Appeal against second-instance judgment dismissed due to lack of standing and procedural error.
VSL sklep II Cp 1700/99
Slovenian court dismisses appeal rejection when plaintiff timely corrects and submits amended complaint.
VSL Sklep II Cp 31/2023
Appeal dismissed because plaintiff failed to submit original documents and sign the translation personally.
Sklep II Ips 639/2001
Appeal rejected because plaintiff lacked lawyer qualification and failed to appoint a legal representative.
VSL Sklep II Cpg 22/2020
Appeal dismissed; late filing excused only by non-responsible error, not negligence or mistake.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Revizija se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Zakon za postopek z nepopolno vlogo ni določil možnosti revizijskega izpodbijanja pritožbene odločbe, predlagatelja pa tudi sicer nista ocenila vrednosti spora.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrglo vlogo predlagateljev z dne 14.07.1999, ker kljub njegovemu sklepu nista ustrezno popravila svoje tožbe zaradi motenja posesti. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo predlagateljev zavrnilo in potrdilo sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

Predlagatelja vlagata pravočasno revizijo in vztrajata, da sta svojo vlogo zaradi motenja posesti ustrezno popravila, sklicujeta pa se tudi na svoje pravno neznanje. Smiselno predlagata razveljavitev sklepa sodišč druge in prve stopnje ter vrnitev zadeve sodišču prve stopnje v nov postopek.

Revizija je bila vročena nasprotni stranki, ki nanjo ni odgovorila, in Državnemu tožilstvu Republike Slovenije, ki se o njej ni izjavilo (tretji odstavek 375. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku - Ur. l. RS, št. 26/99 - v nadaljevanju ZPP).

Revizija ni dovoljena.

Revizija proti sodbi ali sklepu sodišča druge stopnje je izredno pravno sredstvo. Dovoljena je le takrat, če to zakon posebej določa in v premoženjskih sporih, če vrednost izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodne odločbe presega znesek 1.000.000,00 SIT (367. člen in drugi odstavek 384. člena ZPP). V tej zadevi ne gre niti za prvi primer, ker zakon za postopek za nepopolno vlogo ni določil možnosti revizijskega izpodbijanja odločbe sodišča druge stopnje, ne gre pa niti za drugi primer, saj predlagatelja sploh nista ocenila vrednosti spora.

Iz navedenih razlogov je revizijsko sodišče na podlagi 377. člena ZPP zavrglo njuno nedovoljeno revizijo.